Content Introduction I chapter Ancient American Literature

F. Scott Fitzgerald
F. Scott Fitzgerald.
Public Domain

The ironies of racial identity dominate the stories and novels produced by writers of the Harlem Renaissance, including harsh portraits of the Black middle class in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand (1928) and Passing (1929) and the powerful stories of Langston Hughes in The Ways of White Folks (1934), as well as the varied literary materials—poetry, fiction, and drama—collected in Jean Toomer’s Cane (1923). Richard Wright’s books, including Uncle Tom’s Children (1938), Native Son (1940), and Black Boy (1945), were works of burning social protest, Dostoyevskian in their intensity, that dealt boldly with the plight of American Blacks in both the old South and the Northern urban ghetto. Zora Neale Hurston’s training in anthropology and folklore contributed to Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937), her powerful feminist novel about the all-Black Florida town in which she had grown up.

Zora Neale Hurston
Zora Neale Hurston, photograph by Carl Van Vechten, 1938.
Carl Van Vechten Estate/Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (LC-DIG-van-5a52142)
A number of authors wrote proletarian novels attacking capitalist exploitation, as in several novels based on a 1929 strike in the textile mills in Gastonia, N.C., such as Fielding Burke’s Call Home the Heart and Grace Lumpkin’s To Make My Bread (both 1932). Other notable proletarian novels included Jack Conroy’s The Disinherited (1933), Robert Cantwell’s The Land of Plenty (1934), and Albert Halper’s Union Square (1933), The Foundry (1934), and The Chute (1937), as well as some grim evocations of the drifters and “bottom dogs” of the Depression era, such as Edward Anderson’s Hungry Men and Tom Kromer’s Waiting for Nothing (both 1935). The radical movement, combined with a nascent feminism, encouraged the talent of several politically committed women writers whose work was rediscovered later; they included Tillie Olsen, Meridel Le Sueur, and Josephine Herbst.


Conclusion


Some historians, looking back over the first half of the 20th century, were inclined to think that it was particularly noteworthy for its literary criticism. Beyond doubt, criticism thrived as it had not for several generations. It was an important influence on literature itself, and it shaped the perceptions of readers in the face of difficult new writing.
The period began with a battle between two literary groups, one that called its movement New Humanism and stood for older values in judging literature and another group that urged that old standards be overthrown and new ones adopted. The New Humanists, such as Irving Babbitt, a Harvard University professor, and Paul Elmer More, were moralists whose work found an echo in neotraditionalist writers such as T.S. Eliot, who shared their dislike of naturalism, Romanticism, and the liberal faith in progress.