See
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267774198
Computers in the workplace (1)
Article
in
Perspectives on Labour and Income · January 1997
CITATIONS
11
READS
3,164
1 author:
Graham S Lowe
The Graham Lowe Group Inc.
51
PUBLICATIONS
1,321
CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by
Graham S Lowe
on 30 March 2015.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Computers in the workplace (IS 912 A4)
Summer 1991 (Vol. 3, No. 2) Article No. 4
Computers in the workplace
(1)
Graham S. Lowe
Spectacular advances in microelectronic technologies are transforming the workplace.
Over the past
decade, the effects of technological change on employment opportunities, job content and work rewards
have been widely discussed. Indeed, the debate has polarized around positive and negative perspectives.
(2)
The positive image of an emerging postindustrial society emphasizes
the personal and social
advantages of work in hightechnology and informationintensive service industries: jobs will be more
challenging and rewarding, offering employees more control over where, when and how they work.
Critics, however, raise serious doubts. Will more efficient technologies mean fewer jobs? Will
automation de-skill work and reduce the overall quality of working life? And if there are benefits from
automation, who will be the winners?
Unfortunately, with the exception of research by the Economic Council of Canada, few national studies
have examined the extent and impact of technological changes in the workplace.
(3)
Thus it is difficult to
evaluate these competing positions on new technologies. This article injects some new evidence into the
debate using data from the General Social Survey (GSS) of February 1989.
Specifically, the GSS illuminates three issues in workplace automation. First, it documents which
employees are most likely to use mainframe computers, personal computers, and word processors. This
captures office automation, which accounted for the majority of workplace technological innovations in
the last decade.
(4)
However, the survey did not examine the use of new industrial technologies such as
robots, computer numerically
controlled machines, computerassisted manufacturing, or automated
material handling systems. Second, shifting to a broader focus on computers and automated technology,
the GSS addresses how their introduction affected the employed labour force during the 1984 to 1989
period. And third, the survey briefly touches upon the issue of job loss resulting from the introduction of
new technology, broadly defined.