A. Mahmoud El HOSSARY
Egypt
I think Prof. Heege paper is very valuable,
especially in that the tackled the straw effects
in the seedbed. I would to ask hi,: what is the
effect of chopped straw placement on sand
with a high infiltration rate? Does it reduce
the infiltration rate? My question is in
connection with a huge project that is now
being implemented in Egypt, which aims to
create a new delta starting from upstream of
the Nile, in Aswan, to the Western desert. The
sand in that area is very coarse, and we are
facing this problem.
Hermann HEEGE
If you put straw on the surface, this affects
the moisture and the temperature fluctuations
- it affects both. The moisture fluctuation is
reduced, and the temperature fluctuation is
also reduced. The average may remain the
same, it depends on what is happening. So the
average may not be affected, but the
fluctuation is affected, and whether this is an
advantage or a disadvantage is hard to see. I
feel it’s more of an advantage. You get rid of
the extremes.
Gajendra SINGH
AIT
In the developing countries, farmers have
been cultivating farms for centuries using
animal power. And then we introduced the
smaller tractors. So far we have been very
lucky because the tractor size is small, so we
have not introduced the compaction problem
very seriously. Also, we have found a very
good form of co-operation between engineers
and politicians: the reason being that
politicians asked “can we do something for
the small farmer?” and we as engineers said
“OK, you can help us promote mechanical
technology for the smaller farmers, meaning
85
in smaller size”. So the subsidies were
provided for the smaller size equipment, not
for large size, and that was true in many
countries: for example, even in Thailand the
tax for 2200 cm
3
was much higher. India has
continued that policy up to the present, but
now we are confronted with the same
problem that you are facing. With
globalisation, the size, the economies of scale,
all these things are coming into play, and that
approach of helping the smaller farmers with
smaller sized technology is not able to
compete with the custom-operated large size
equipment. Can a group like this come up
with a strategy that for field operations, for
soil manipulation, sets some guidelines or
some limits on the soil pressure? I don’t think
you can implement such guidelines, but
issuing them would go a long way. We have
been trying to do this in India, through the
discussions I initiated over the last three
years, and we said: “if we can limit to around
30 kW operation for field operations - for
tillage - we don’t see much problem with
compaction”. But now we’ve also looked at
the way the tractor industry is going, and all
the custom work where they are interested in
rate of work, more work per unit time,
reducing the labour cost... they’re interested
more in area, getting more income. It seems
to work perfectly well when you are using
tractors for stationary operations like
threshing; in that case it does not matter, you
can use any size because it’s stationary.
Likewise, in pumping it does not matter. But
for anything to do with traffic in the field, if
some kind of policy can be developed based
on the research, providing guidelines for
limiting the soil pressure of tillage field
equipment, I think this kind of thing will help
the groups in various countries. Pointing out
what have been the consequences of large size
equipment in Europe or the USA, and why
you first put in more energy to do the
operation, and then put in even more energy
to undo the compaction.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |