8
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION: INTELLIGENT VEHICULAR COMMUNICATIONS
the driver does not adequately respond to warnings, collision-avoidance systems might take control of
the steering, brakes, or throttle to maneuver the vehicle back to a safe state. Driver-assistance systems
include functions such as adaptive cruise control, lane keeping, precision docking (which will be dis-
cussed later), and precise maneuvering. Vehicle-automation systems include low speed automation, au-
tonomous driving, and close-headway platooning (which provides increased roadway throughput), and
electronic vehicle guidance in segregated areas such as busways and freight terminals. These systems
can
be autonomous, with all instrumentation and intelligence of the vehicle, or cooperative, where as-
sistance comes from the roadway, other vehicles, or both. Roadway assistance typically takes the form
of passive reference markers in the infrastructure. Vehicle–vehicle cooperation lets vehicles operate in
close proximity for increased efficiency, usually by transmitting key vehicle parameters and intentions
to following vehicles. The general philosophy is that autonomous systems will work on all roadways in
all situations at a useful performance level and take advantage of cooperative elements, as available, to
augment and enhance system performance.
In ITS, each vehicle takes on the role of sender, receiver, and router to broadcast information to the
vehicular network or transportation agency, which then uses the information
to ensure safe and free
flow of traffic. For communication to occur between vehicles and RSU, vehicles must be equipped with
some sort of radio interface or OBU that enables short-range wireless ad hoc networks to be formed.
Vehicles must also be fitted with hardware that permits detailed position information such as a GPS
or a differential global positioning system (DGPS) receiver. Fixed RSUs, which are connected to the
backbone network, must be in place to facilitate communication. The number and distribution of RSU
are dependent on the communication protocol to be used. For example, some protocols require RSU
to be distributed evenly throughout the whole road network, some require RSU only at intersections,
while others require RSU only at region borders. Although it is safe to assume that the infrastructure ex-
ists to some extent and vehicles have access to it intermittently, it is unrealistic to require that vehicles
always have wireless access to RSU.
depicts the possible communication configurations in
ITS. These include intervehicle, vehicle-to-roadside, and routing-based communications. Intervehicle,
vehicle-to-roadside, and routing-based communications rely on very accurate
and up-to-date informa-
tion about the surrounding environment, which in turn requires the use of accurate positioning systems
and smart communication protocols for exchanging information. In a network environment in which
the communication medium is shared, highly unreliable, and with limited bandwidth, smart commu-
nication protocols must guarantee fast and reliable delivery of information to all vehicles in the vicin-
ity. It is worth mentioning that intravehicle communication uses technologies such as IEEE 802.15.1
(bluetooth), IEEE 802.15.3 (ultra-wide band), and IEEE 802.15.4 (Zigbee) that can be used to support
wireless communication inside a vehicle, but this is outside the scope of this chapter and will not be
discussed further.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: