See
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342926122
Spotlight on Uzbekistan
Book
· July 2020
CITATIONS
0
READS
1,675
13 authors
, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Technical University of Darmstadt
View project
Central
Eurasia Analytical Group, www.ceasia.org
View project
Adam Hug
Foreign Policy Centre
3
PUBLICATIONS
2
CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Vladimir Paramonov
Uzbekistan
Academy of Sciences
55
PUBLICATIONS
61
CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by
Vladimir Paramonov
on 14 July 2020.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Spotlight on Uzbekistan
2
Executive Summary
Spotlight on Uzbekistan finds that the much talked about reform process in Uzbekistan is real, but
that so are the significant holes in it, with a lot of work still needing to be done to create an open
economy, pluralist politics and free society. It remains unclear if President Mirziyoyev’s plans are
simply for the authoritarian modernisation seen so far or whether
something more ambitious is
planned. Since 2016, there has been appreciable economic progress, a reduction in state
interference in everyday life, and notable increase in some freedoms, particularly for
activists and
experts who choose in some way to engage with the Government’s reform project. This genuine
progress has garnered Uzbekistan much international good will as it has returned to the world stage.
However, Mirziyoyev’s pro-business approach and connections to leading business people have
created new concerns about cronyism, corruption and citizens forced out of their
homes with
inadequate compensation as part of building the new Uzbekistan. So far the reforms have created a
type of ‘managed freedom’, where there is space for ‘constructive criticism’ but some sensitive
topics remain off limits. The response to recent crises have highlighted the successes and failings of
the new system: showing swift action to get on top of the initial challenges; rapid, numerous but not
wholly joined up initiatives to tackle the economic and social impact; a reticence to address
historic
and structural problems; and new opportunities for local abuses of power. As Uzbekistan becomes
more self-confident about the progress of the reforms and its place in the world, it needs to show a
more self-confident approach towards its own past, convening a national conversation involving
those who suffered under Karimov, the Government and with local and international experts.
The publication makes key recommendations for the Government of Uzbekistan. It should:
Continue reforming the civil service to improve structures and capacity while being more
measured and consultative when creating new legislation and decrees.
Develop a more competitive political environment in Uzbekistan by removing restrictions on
registering new parties and allowing independent candidates to stand for election.
Reform local government by requiring the direct elections of
Governors and Mayors, with
greater public consultation on planning decisions, action on forced evictions, lack of
compensation, the provision of social infrastructure and protecting historic buildings.
Require transparency for all holders of public office including politicians and judges with
declarations of external
sources of income and assets, while making public the ownership details
of firms involved in the new cotton ‘clusters’.
Move beyond ‘constructive criticism’ to true freedom of expression and association including by
delivering new anti-defamation laws without the threat of prison or massive fine and allowing
independent NGOs to register, while helping them do so.
Help facilitate the end of the boycott of Uzbek cotton by urgently registering the cotton
monitoring NGOs and independent trade unions, working with them to end forced labour.
Continue the reform of the Prosecutor General’s Office, security services and judiciary to
prevent the harassment of activists and political opponents.
Deliver transitional justice and greater openness about the Karimov legacy that includes helping
the rehabilitation of victims of past abuse and an open public dialogue.
Continue to expand both religious and social freedoms that prioritise individual
choice over
community pressure, with more women in senior government positions, action on domestic
violence, freedoms for religious groups and ending laws against the LGBTQ community.
