Bank of baroda

BANK OF BARODA
Sr.No.
Name and No. of the case
Nature of dispute
Amt. involved
15.
Delhi High Court-UTI Vs. J C Katyal,
J C Katyal, Assistant was dismissed on 17.12.1987
Rs.2.5 million
(WP No.—— of 2005)
after an enquiry. The Tribunal vide its award
dated 28.04.2005 has awarded reinstatement with
back wages with the lesser punishment of
withholding two increments instead of dismissal.
We have filed a writ petition challenging the award
of the Tribunal and the High Court has stayed the
award of Tribunal till the next date of hearing
21.09.2005.
16.
Kolkata H.C. - Ashok Kumar Das
Wait listed employee who could not be offered
Nil
Vs. UTI (C.O. No.4546 of 1996)
employment due to lack of vacancies. Case filed
seeking appointment.
17.
Kolkata H.C.-Prasanna Orang Vs. UTI
-do-
Nil
(C.O.No.11219 (W) of 1996)
18.
Kolkata H.C. - Tanujendra Mukherjee -do-
Nil
Vs. UTI (WP.No.1005 of 1997)
19.
Patna H.C. - Ravi S. Prasad Vs. UTI
-do-
Nil
(MJC 3208 of 1998)
(WP.No.9269 of 2001)
20.
Hyderabad H.C.-Vani Prasad Vs. UTI
-do-
Nil
(WP No.13104 of 2001)
21.
Ahmedabad Civil Court-D.M.Katwala
-do-
Nil
Vs. UTI (C.S.No.2126 of 1997)
22.
Mumbai H.C. - BKKM Vs. UTI
Contract workmen engaged in Electrical/ AC mainte-
Nil
(WP.No.4925 of 2000)
nance seeking abolition of contract labour system.
23.
Mumbai H.C. - Contact Laghu Udyog Canteen contract workmen seeking quashing of the
Nil
Kamgar Union Vs. UTI
order of Tribunal holding that they are not entitled
(WP.No.2908 of 2003)
for regularisation in UTI
24.
Mumbai H.C. - UTI Vs. State of
Appeal of UTI against order of the Magistrate to
Nil
Maharashtra (WP.No.4078 of 2000)
engage security guards through the Board.
25.
Madras H.C. - UTI Vs. UT SC/ST
Obtaining injuction against demonstarion on March 16,
Nil
Association, Chennai
1999.
(Civil Suit No.199 of 1999)
26.
Madras H.C.-Selvaraj, UT SC/ST Assn.,
SC/ST Assn. Praying that engaging VSS optees at
Nil
Chennai Vs. UTI
UTIISL without notification to employment exchange
(WP.No.24611 of 2003)
etc. as improper.
27.
22
nd
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Reg. Non display of notices under Contract Labour Act
Nil
Mumbai LEO Vs. UTI
(CC No.120 /SLC/2003)
28.
Magistrate court, Kolkata LEO Vs.
Non-display of notices under Contract Labour.
Nil
UTI (R.K.Mangla) (No.3465 of 2003)
29.
Magistrate court, Kolkata LEO Vs.
Regarding not obtaining registration certificate under
Nil
UTI (S K Saha) (No.3888 of 2003)
Contract Labour Act.

---

319