2.4.1
Communicative framework by M. Celce-Murcia, D.M. Brinton
and J.M. Goodwin
For the purpose of the present investigation and the performance of
the intervention, all the practical activities and instructions were selected
and organised in accordance with the Communicative Framework for
teaching English pronunciation offered by Celce-Murcia; Brinton and
Goodwin in “Teaching Pronunciation Hardback with Audio CDs (2): A
Course Book and Reference Guide” (2010)
76
. This framework was used
to deal with the cases of phonological interference studied in the present
investigation, however, it is not the purpose of the study to prove or
disprove that the use of these specific materials or the framework is
suitable for the particular investigation to improve the pronunciation of
the targeted sounds.
The
Communicative
Framework
for
teaching
English
pronunciation by Celce-Murcia; Brinton and Goodwin (2010) suggests
the division of the pronunciation lesson into five phases:
74
Low, E.L. (2014). Ibid. p. 162.
75
Roach, P. (1983):
English Phonetics and Phonology
. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, p.6.
76
Celce-Murcia, M.; Brinton D. M. and Goodwin, J. M. (2010):
Teaching
Pronunciation Hardback with Audio CDs (2): A Course Book and Reference Guide.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46
1) Description and analysis- oral and written illustrations of how
the feature is produced and when it occurs within spoken discourse.
2) Listening discrimination- focused listening practice with
feedback on learners’ ability to correctly discriminate the feature.
3) Controlled practice- oral reading of minimal-pair sentences,
short dialogues, etc. with special attention paid to the highlighted feature
in order to raise learner consciousness.
4) Guided practice- structured communication exercises, such as
information-gap activities or cued dialogues that enable the learner to
monitor for the specified feature.
5) Communicative practice- less structured, fluency-building
activities (e.g. role play, problem solving) that require the learner to
attend both form and content of utterances
77
.
This framework was used in the present investigation due to its
clear and detailed format for teaching the English language
pronunciation. It proposes to start with the description and analysis of a
certain feature, then incorporate listening discrimination and provide the
learners with sufficient amount of communicative practice.
77
Celce-Murcia, M.; Brinton D. M. and Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Ibid. p. 45.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |