Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR)
https://www.tarj.in
641
AJMR
become more flexible and mobile. As an example, supporters of this theory cite the
implementation of the 1C: Accounting program.
At the very beginning of its implementation, many accountants were convinced that it would ruin
their profession and lead to a sharp reduction in local accountants. However, this was not
observed. In addition, the mobility of the accountants themselves has increased. Opportunities
for additional earnings from accounting for small entrepreneurs opened up before them, and
entrepreneurs can now afford, depending on the size of the enterprise, not to keep an accountant
on a permanent basis.
A similar example can be found with Uber, which revolutionized passenger transportation. At
the same time, initially, the company's idea was considered a sabotage for the industry, since it
would have to dismiss all taxi operators, reduce the number of working taxi drivers (this
judgment was based on the fact that the mobility of taxi drivers would increase, but the demand
would remain the same, which would lead to an inevitable reduction), price dumping in the
industry (this would lead to a reduction in the net profit of enterprises). Over time, it turned out
that there was no need to fire taxi drivers and operators, and the demand for taxis and the
company's net profit increased. At the same time, the mobile taxi application made it possible to
attract new taxi drivers, for whom the transportation of passengers is an additional income in
their free time from their main work.
It should be noted that corporate practice also knows unsuccessful examples of world-renowned
companies that unconditionally used only one technology to develop their business.
A prime example is the Kodak company, which did not want to develop digital photography,
because I truly believed in the long-term success of analog photography. Because of this, the
company did not develop other areas of activity, which subsequently led to its bankruptcy.
In addition, as previously noted, until now, global organizations have not developed a unified
approach to the application, management and determination of the boundaries of the use of
digital technologies, which forces many managers to act blindly with an absolute lack of
guidelines for the application of new technologies. In other words, managers cannot guarantee
100% digital impact due to the lack of rules and standards that would help managers understand
the potential of today's technology.
Thus, at present, managers need to find new standards, bodies of knowledge and frameworks,
(software products that simplify the creation and support of technically complex or loaded
projects. The framework, as a rule, contains only basic software modules, and all project-specific
components are implemented developer based on them. ), helping to build successful strategies
for managing a company in the digital economy.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |