Andizhan state university named after zakhiriddin mukhammad babur

CONCLUSION
Literary characterization through plays is an interesting way of writing that adds more depth and insight into literary genres. This study aimed at investigating critically Osborne’s use of socio-psychological dimensions inhis literary work by analyzing threeof his plays, namely, (Look Back in Anger, The Entertainer and Inadmissible Evidence). The main objectives of the study were to analyse the major characters in the three plays mentioned above by applying socio-psychological method and to and to explore the author’s socio-psychological background which was reflected in them. The researcher also aimed at drawing more attention to the areas of sociology and psychology in literature. The study followed the critical analytical method. The main findings of the study are as follows:The social and psychological dimensions of Osborne’s own life in the above stated three plays of this study deepen the knowledge of readers and audience.
Osborne’s manages to mix between British social and psychological before and after world war II. The social and psychological dimensions of Osborne’s own life in the plays help to furnish a comprehensive deep social reading of British life after world war II. The study recommends the following: readers and audience of Osborne’s plays must be well-acquainted with the main characteristics of sociology and psychology in literature, department of Foreign Languages both at secondary and university levels should encourage students to read and research in British literature in all its genres, and, more British novelists, poets, playwrights, essayists and their social and psychological works should be embedded in the courses of faculties of Arts and Education for students who study English instead of depending on two or three British literary writers to enlarge the students’ not only their social and psychological background in the field of literature but also to enrich them thoroughly in all its aspects.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. 
   Sh.M. Mirziyoyev. Teachers and trainers are our great strength, support and backbone in building a new Uzbekistan. Speech by the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Sh.M. Mirziyoyev at the ceremony dedicated to the Day of Teachers and Trainers // “Khalk suzi”, October 1, 2020.
   
2. 
   Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Sh.M. Mirziyoyev “On approval of the Concept for the development of the higher education system of the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030”. https://uza.uz/oz/documents/zbekiston-respublikasi-oliy-talim-tizimini-2030-yilgacha-riv-09-10-2019.
   
   1. 
      Banham, Martin. Osborne. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd, 1969.
      
   2. 
      Brien, Alan. “Snot or Not?” Review of Almost a Gentleman. New Statesman Society 4 (November 15, 1991): 47. In Denison, Patricia D., ed. John Osborne: A Casebook. New York:Garland,1997.
      
3. 
   Ferrar, Harold. John Osborne. New York: Columbia University Press, 1973.
   
4. 
   Gilleman, Luc. John Osborne: Vituperative Artist. New York: Routledge, 2002.
   
5. 
   Hayman, Ronald. John Osborne. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1972.
   
6. 
   Hinchliffe, Arnold P. British Theatre, 1950-1970. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1974.
   
7. 
   Hinchliffe, Arnold P. British Theatre, 1950-1970. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1974..
   
8. 
   John Osborne. Boston: Twayne, 1984.
   
   1. 
      9Osborne, John. The Entertainer, Faber and Faber, London, 1957
      Tynan, Kenneth. Tynan on Theatre, Penguin Books, London, 1964
      
   2. 
      10Success Stories (1988) by Harry Ritchie, a well-documented history of the AYM as a journalistic phenomenon
      
   3. 
      The Angry Young Men: A Literary Comedy of the 1950s (2002) by Humphrey Carpenter, an anecdotal group biography
      
   4. 
      11Tynan, Kenneth. Tynan on Theatre, Penguin Books, London, 1964
      
   5. 
      SECONDARY SOURCES
      
   6. 
      ^ Jump up to: ^{a b c d e f g h} Gilleman, Luc (2008). "From Coward and Rattigan to Osborne: Or the Enduring Importance of Look Back in Anger". Modern Drama. 51 (1): 104–124. doi:10.3138/md.51.1.104.
      
   7. 
      ^ Jump up to: ^{a b} Langford, Larry (1997). "The Unsocial Socialism of John Osborne". English Studies. 78 (3): 237–257. doi:10.1080/00138389708599074.
      
   8. 
      ^ Jump up to: ^{a b c d} Weiss, Samuel (1960). "Osborne's Angry Young Play". Educational Theatre Journal. 12 (4): 285–288. doi:10.2307/3204555. JSTOR 3204555.
      
   9.