Arguments for and against net neutrality
Proponents of net neutrality argue that it is fundamental to the protection of con‑
sumer choice and innovation on the internet, and advocates in the US have cited
the First Amendment to the constitution, arguing that net neutrality is necessary to
M03_CHAF6542_06_SE_C03.indd 117
7/22/14 1:37 AM
118
Part 1 Introduction
ensure freedom of speech. Some large internet application and content companies
tend to be advocates of net neutrality, alongside some consumer rights groups.
Opponents to net neutrality argue that they should be able to offer different quali‑
ties of service, both in order to recover their infrastructure investment costs and to
enable quality of service guarantees to improve the consumer experience for ser‑
vices such as VoIP or video streaming. In the United States, cable and incumbent
telecom operators have also claimed that the First Amendment supports opposition
to net neutrality, arguing that they cannot be compelled to promote speech with
which they disagree.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |