8127/frame/fm


Conclusion, Inference, or Opinion of Common Source



Download 8,29 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet105/297
Sana27.04.2022
Hajmi8,29 Mb.
#584966
1   ...   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   ...   297
Bog'liq
Principles and Practice of CRIMINALISTICS The Profession of Forensic Science (Protocols in Forensic Science) by Keith Inman, Norah Rudin (z-lib.org)

1.
Conclusion, Inference, or Opinion of Common Source
The analyst must now express the results of his formal consideration of the
relationship between the evidence and reference items. He started the exam-
ination by formulating (explicitly or not) a source determination question
in the form of the null hypothesis: “I will prove that this reference is the
source of the evidence.” Failure to disprove the null hypothesis means that
the analyst 
hasn’t
shown that the evidence and reference 
do not
share a
common origin. In other words, the analyst is forced to admit that they may
share a common source, and, in the case of classified evidence, that the
evidence may also have other potential sources. A way of expressing this in
* Most often, the items are an evidence sample and a reference sample, but they could
also be two evidence items. 
8127/frame/ch06 Page 137 Friday, July 21, 2000 11:47 AM


138
Principles and Practice of Criminalistics
a few words is that the analysis leads to an 
inference of common source between
the evidence and reference samples
. Note that both classified and individual-
ized evidence may lead to an inference of common source; the difference is
in the number of sources, one for individualization, or more than one for
classification.
Throughout this chapter, we have referred to an 
inference 
of common
source, rather than a
 conclusion
of common source. We have also used the
term 
opinion 
to summarize the individualization process. 
Webster’s
(1996)
defines these terms as follows:
We believe the term 
inference
is best suited to communicating our belief of
common source. For our purposes, an inference is more appropriately
defined as a conclusion derived from both facts 
and
assumptions. An infer-
ence is not fact per se; it is only as strong as the limitations of the combination
of evidence, test, and test results. An expression of these limitations will be
different for classified evidence than it is for individualized evidence. We
develop these ideas in the Section F of this chapter.

Download 8,29 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   ...   297




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2025
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish