2 The role speech recognition software teaching and learning

Glossary
Decree --- an official order that has the force of law
Implementation --- the process of putting a decision or plan into effect; execution.
ICT --- Information and Communication Technology in education is the mode of education that use information and communications technology to support, enhance, and optimise the delivery of information. Worldwide research has shown that ICT can lead to an improved student learning and better teaching methods
Collaborative --- involving two or more people working together for a special purpose:
ENIAC --- the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer
Subsidiary --- used to refer to something less important than something else with which it is connected:
Benefit --- a helpful or good effect, or something intended to help, an advantage such as medical insurance, life insurance, and sick pay, that employees receive from their employer in addition to money.
Rosetta Stone --- Rosetta Stone is a computer-assisted language learning software developed and manufactured by Rosetta Stone Inc. The name of the program and its logo refer to the Rosetta stone, which allowed linguists to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Subsequent --- use subsequent to describe something that happened or existed after the time or event that has just been referred to.
References and Further Reading

1. 
   Bax, S. (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28. Available:
   
2. 
   Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. New York: Longman.
   
3. 
   Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge.
   
4. 
   Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   

5. 
   Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer. M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
   
6. 
   Levy, M. (1997) CALL: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   

5. 
   LITTLE, David. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching 39:3: 167-90.
   
6. 
   LITTLE, David. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the Making of Supranational Language Education Policy. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 645-655.
   
7. 
   LITTLE, David. (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44(3), 381-393.
   
8. 
   LITTLE, David. (2012). The CEFR and language teaching/learning. In ACTFL- CEFR Symposium, Graz, Austria. [online]. http://www.uni-leipzig.de/actflcefr/material/Teaching%20Learning%20CEFR%20Little.pdf.
   

5. 
   Meskill, C. (2002). Teaching and learning in real time: Media, technologies, and language acquisition. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
   
6. 
   Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Available: http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm
   
7. 
   Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An
   

10. 
    Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    
11. 
    Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (pp. 15-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    

1^ Our understanding of dialogic teaching follow the tradition of Nystrand et al. (​1997)

2^ Bishop Grosseteste University College, 2007;1 National Literacy Trust, 2007; Teachernet, 2007

3^ Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages An Introduction. David Nunan. 2003

4^ Bax, S. (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28. Available:

5^ Hardisty and Windeatt (1989) (1989, p.3)

6^ Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. New York: Longman.

7^ Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge.

8^ LITTLE, David. (2012). The CEF and language teaching/learning. In ACTFL- CEFR Symposium, Graz, Austria