Kali yuga report 120902 1 Domestic terrorism American style

Shas Spiritual Leader Calls on Jews to Pray for Annihilation of Iran

Download 328.34 Kb.
Hajmi328.34 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   16

Shas Spiritual Leader Calls on Jews to Pray for Annihilation of Iran

By Haaretz and Reuters

August 27, 2012 "Haaretz" -- During his weekly sermon, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef says Jews should pray for destruction of the enemies of Israel, with an emphasis on Iran and Hezbollah.

During his weekly sermon, the spiritual leader of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party said his followers should pray for the annihilation of the enemies of the Jewish people during Rosh Hashana (Jewish New Year), with an emphasis on Iran and Hezbollah.

“When we say ‘may our enemies be struck down’ on Rosh Hashana, it shall be directed at Iran, the evil ones who threaten Israel. God shall strike them down and kill them,” said Yosef.

Before his comment, senior defense officials, including National Security Council head Ya'akov Amidror and Interior Minister Eli Yishai, had visited the rabbi to persuade him to support a possible Israeli attack on Iran.

It is not known whether Amidror or any of the others succeeded in persuading Yosef. However, during a sermon delivered the previous week, a day after his meeting with Amidror, Yosef said: "You know what situation we're in, there are evil people, Iran, about to destroy us. ... We must pray before [the almighty] with all our heart."

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet, which Israeli officials have said is divided over the question of launching a go-it-alone attack on Iran, includes a Shas minister as one of its eight members.

Iran claims to be enriching uranium for peaceful purposes only.

Yosef wields significant influence over Shas's lawmakers, who seek his guidance on policy.

In the past, the Baghdad-born Yosef has stirred controversy by likening Palestinians to snakes, calling for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to "perish from this world" and describing non-Jews as "born only to serve us".

But he has also spoken out in favour of Israel ceding occupied land for peace with the Palestinians in order to end conflict and save Jewish lives.

Washington Opposes Peace

by Stephen Lendman

America’s history is blood-drenched. Permanent war is policy. Peace and stability are verboten.

One nation after another is targeted. Aggressive wars follow. Rule of law principles and democratic values are discarded. Wealth, power and unchallengeable dominance alone matter. Scoundrel supporters glorify what they should condemn. More on them below. Syria is being ravaged and destroyed. Spurious accusations target Iran. Neither country threatens anyone. Malicious lies say otherwise.

Headlines claim Tehran keeps accelerating efforts to produce nuclear weapons. No evidence whatever is cited. On August 25, Reuters headlined “IAEA gets no deal with Iran on bomb research suspicions,” saying : So-called “concerns” about “suspected nuclear weapons research by Tehran” weren’t resolved. IAEA chief inspector Herman Nackaerts said important differences remain. Agreement looks unlikely. The IAEA was established to promote peaceful nuclear energy use. Allegedly an independent autonomous organization, it reports to the Security Council and General Assembly. Under current head Yukiya Amano, it’s an imperial tool. Washington chose him. He serves US interests. His mandate excludes independence, objectivity, and honesty. Despite no evidence of Iranian nuclear weapons research and development, he claims otherwise. 

Earlier he used forged or otherwise suspect documents. What long ago was discredited became Exhibit A. Old material was recycled to look new. Amano’s predecessor, Mohamed ElBaradei, didn’t play by US rules and got sacked. What Washington says goes. Chief inspector Nackaerts’ mandate is prevent resolution. Otherwise US/Israeli accusations fall flat. Imperial aims are sidetracked until new schemes emerge. Regime change is policy. War plans are longstanding. Timing alone is unknown. Perhaps 2013 is planned. The fullness of time will tell. A steady drumbeat of inflammatory media reports and commentaries advances the ball for what no one should contemplate or tolerate.

On nuclear issues, no country cooperates more than Iran. It exceeds what most others would tolerate. It want equal, fair treatment. It deserves no less. Its program is peaceful. It complies fully with NPT provisions. America long ago spurned them. So does Israel. Both countries are nuclear outlaws. Headlines don’t accuse them of threatening world peace. IAEA inspectors don’t target them. They operate extrajudicially and get away with it. Only Iran is challenged. False accusations persist. Multiple negotiation rounds got nowhere. Washington prevents resolution. So does Israel. Doing so complicates their agenda.

Following Friday’s Vienna meeting, Iran’s IAEA representative, Ali Asghar Soltaniyeh, commented as follows : “We had about eight hours of intensive discussions in a constructive environment. We mostly tried to bridge the gaps (relating to) differences in the structure, approach, or modality for resolving the issues.” “We had….progress….but, of course, there are still some points that have to be worked out at a later stage. In the meantime, these are issues regarding allegations which….in many cases proved baseless and with political motivations.”  

Nackaerts was ordered to assure discussions went nowhere. Follow-up isn’t planned. Before talks ended, Netanyahu claimed “additional proof that Iran is continuing accelerated progress towards achieving nuclear weapons and is totally ignoring international demands.” 

Netanyahu’s an inveterate liar. He’s also more bark than bite. Israel won’t go it alone against Iran. Doing so would be suicidal. Key Israeli past and current military and government officials oppose war. They do so for good reason.

Bluster is part of a politician’s portfolio. Netanyahu and Defense Minister Barak take it to the extreme. Talk is one thing. Destructive policy quite another.

War very likely is planned. Expect it on Washington’s timetable, not Israel’s. When it comes, America will be the lead belligerent. Israel will ride shotgun. The entire region and beyond will be threatened. Catastrophic consequences may follow.

World peace never was more threatened. It hangs by a thread. Daily articles and commentaries don’t feature an issue too grave to ignore. Instead, truth is maliciously inverted.

Enemies are created when none exist. War talk persists. Wrong over right is promoted. Potential catastrophic consequences are ignored. So are body counts, massive human suffering, and what fuels Washington’s addiction.

Neoconservative hawk Charles Krauthhammer is a Fox New regular. He’s also a Washington Post columnist. He tilts far enough right to be belligerent. His style substitutes hyperbole for facts.

He blames Assad for massacres and other atrocities committed by Western recruited death squads. He backs more aggressive intervention.

He’s merciless on Iran. On August 23, he headlined “The Cordesman criteria.” He accused Iranian leaders of “increasing menacing annihilationist threats.”

He claims Israel faces “the most virulent genocidal threats since Nazi Germany.”

“Time is short,” he says. “Last-ditch negotiations….failed abjectly. The Iranians are contemptuously playing with the process. The strategy is delay until they get the bomb.”

Request “congressional authorization for the use of force if Iran does not negotiate denuclearization.” End status quo “drift through kabuki negotiations.” The alternative is “liv(ing) under the threat of nuclear blackmail from a regime the State Department (calls) the world’s greatest exporter of terror.”

Readers believe this stuff. So do Fox News viewers. Never mind what’s true or false. Krauthammer, like other neocons, demands surrender. Iran won’t play that dirty game. His alternative is war.

Center for Strategic & International Studies analyst Anthony Cordesman was more measured. Nonetheless, he fell woefully short. He headlined an August 1 commentary “Iran: Preventing War by Making it Credible.”

The best way perhaps to prevent was is threaten it, he believes. Justifiability was ignored. So were rule of law principles and what drives US and Israeli threats.

Like others representing right-wing military interests, Cordesman accepts the fiction of an Iranian threat. His analysis proceeds accordingly.

He’s concerned about Washington and Israel biting off more than they can chew. He wants to head fake Iran into submission.

Instead of explaining Tehran’s peace agenda, its longstanding nonbelligerence, its advocacy for a denuclearized Middle East, and desire for friendly relations with all nations, he proposes threatening Iran short of war.

He suggests three actions:

(1) Focus negotiations around “clear US redlines.” End ambiguity. “Iran needs to know there are real limits to how long it can talk and stall.” Submit to US demands or face war. Never mind that Tehran negotiates in good faith. Washington obstructs resolution. Like other imperial supporters, Cordesman blames the victim.

(2) “(M)ake it clear to Iran that it has no successful options.” Surrender on US terms or else. Imply shock and awe bombing and other belligerent options. (S)peak softly while….carr(ying) a big stick.”

(3) Give Iran a face saving way out. Make it appear like “a kind of victory.” End sanctions. Offer trade, other economic, and political incentives. Package them with other countries. Make surrender look like victory.

America and Israel don’t negotiate. They demand. Promises they make aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. Many nations learned the hard way.

Iran wants its sovereign rights respected. It deserves that much and more. It’s endured decades of US/Israeli isolation and hostility. It’s not about to accept unreasonable demands.

Doing so won’t end war threats. At best they’ll be delayed. Washington wants pro-Western puppets replacing Tehran’s leaders. War is the bottom line option of choice.

Cordesman didn’t explain. Nor do Western fourth estate pressitutes. They willingly go along with what they should condemn.   They make death and destruction possible. They’ll get more than they bargain for if Washington and Israel attack Iran. What better reason than that to oppose it.

A Final Comment : Washington has few profiles in courage. On war and peace issues, even fewer. Herd mentality dominates thinking. Politicians march in lockstep. An occasional exception proves the rule. During last December’s Republican presidential debate, Ron Paul opposed war on Iran. His comments bear repeating. He spoke forthrightly and was condemned. Doing the right thing has a price. He’s “running with the American people,” he said. Lots of evidence suggests Iran has no nuclear weapons program. “There’s no U.N. evidence of that happening.” “There is no difference from 2003. You know what I really fear about this. It’s another Iraq coming. It’s war propaganda coming on….To me the greatest danger is that we will have a president who will overreact, and we will soon bomb Iran.” “It would make more sense if we lived through the Cold War, which we did, with 30,000 missiles pointed at us. We ought to really sit back and look and think and not jump the gun and think we’re going to be attacked. That’s how we got into that useless war in Iraq and lost so much in Iraq.” “Nuclear weapons are loaded over there. Pakistan, India, Israel has 300 of them. We have our ships over there. We have to keep this in the proper context. We don’t need another war!”

What about Iran’s threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, he was asked ?

“The plans are on the books. All they talk about is when are we, the west, going to bomb Iran? They don’t have a nuclear weapon. Why wouldn’t they try to send out some information, you know if you come and bomb us, we might shut the straits of Hormuz down.” “We have 12,000 diplomats. We ought to use a little bit of diplomacy once in a while.” “Obviously I would like to see a lot less nuclear weapons. I don’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I would like to reduce them because there would be less chance of war.” “But to declare war on 1.2 billion Muslims and say all Muslims are the same? This is dangerous talk. Yeah there are some radicals. They don’t come here to kill us because we’re free and prosperous.”  “They come here and they explicitly explain it to us. The CIA has explained this to us. They come here and want to do us harm because we’re bombing them.” “Why were we flying drones over Iran? Why do we have to bomb so many countries? Why do we have 900 bases in (hundreds of) countries and we’re totally bankrupt?” “How are we going to take care of the people? I think this wild goal is to have another war in the name of defense is the dangerous thing. The danger is really us overreacting, and we need a strong national defense and only go to war when there’s a declaration of war…instead of starting these wars so often….”

Asked about Iran’s alleged threat to annihilate Israel, he said : “There is no UN report that said that. It’s totally wrong on what you just said. That is not true. They produced information that led you to believe that. But they have no evidence.” “You cannot solve these problems with war….Get them over with, instead of this endless fighting and this endless attitude that we have enemies all around the world…” Rarely are these type comments heard on Capitol Hill. US national television almost never airs them. They’re unheard of in presidential debates. Media scoundrels promoting war jump all over opponents.  

Paul remains anti-war. Imagine if a majority in Congress agreed. Imagine peace instead of endless wars. If Congress won’t do what’s right, ordinary people must act. Either we stop wars or they’ll destroy us. A threat that real demands action.  

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War” http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html



13 - Lindsey Williams : US Government Will Shutdown Financially

Lindsey Williams has received information from a woman who works for Raytheon who has security clearance .

The woman states that the US Government has notified Raytheon to prepare for a US Government shutdown.This is supposed to be happening sometime in the very near future.The liberty oil rig has stopped drilling and won’t continue drilling until oil hits $150 a barrel.


General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years

CIA Agent "NEVER watch television"!!


Chocolate, America, John Cleese & a Kosher Armageddon (must watch)


Chocolate, America and a Kosher Armageddon

 In this new Israeli advert for Chocolate Spread you can learn what it takes to drag America into a Kosher war.

I guess that in reality it takes slightly more than just chocolate spread, but, seemingly, not much more than that.

p.s. It looks as if John Cleese doesn't take BDS seriously

Rinaldo Francesca interviews Gilad Atzmon (very interesting)


Here is a chalenging short  film made by Rinaldo Francesca:

Final Evidence : The USA Has Gone Crazy

A deaf preschooler in Grand Island, Nebraska, has been prohibited from signing his own name 

because school administrators believe the gesture he uses looks too much like a gun.  

We are Preparing for Massive Civil War, Says DHS Informant 
Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel and Wikileaks—Revisited

With the Julian Assange extradition issue hitting the headlines, yet again, I urge you to watch this video and remember that all is not as it appears on the surface. My original description still holds, for when the video was first uploaded: Wikileaks has given the mainstream media yet another opportunity to vilify Iran. A typical headline, from the New York Times was: "Around the world distress over Iran." And, ironically, it is true, but not in the way the headline writer meant. Around the world there is distress over Iran, distress at the way it is being cast in the role of the Evil Doer, when all but the most ignorant observers realise that it is nuclear-armed Apartheid Israel that is the real threat to world peace, not Iran.

The Outrageous Racist Hypocrisy of Israel and World Zionism

"I saw the whole beating, it's a good thing that they beat the Arabs..." Video -  Just days after a mob of Jewish Israelis beat and injured three Palestinian youth, one nearly to death, Israel's Ynet news website conducted interviews in Central Jerusalem 

Physician accuses rabbi of circumcision torture infants



Chief physician accuses chief rabbi of circumcision torture of Judaic infants 
In Danish with English subtitles. Approx. 6 minutes.
Revolution 2012 : It's Time To Rise - 5 Minute Video

The time has come. Be the change you want to see in this world.  


MEMRI : BEN GURION ordered Kennedy Killing 

How The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11


CIA insider tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view, America !


14 - What happens when they start killing Christians ?

Posted by: Michael Collins Posted date: August 27, 2012

Michael Collins

What really scandalizes us is that the Western world is encouraging this rise of sectarian violence just to topple the [al-Assad] regime. Mother Agnes Miriam, Syria

NATO and Saudi supported Free Syrian Army democracy warriors areattacking and killing Christians in Syria. Reports indicate that various Christian denominations are special targets for kidnapping, violence and intimidation. (Image) For example:

“Syrian rebel forces have trapped over 12,000 Greek Catholics in a village near the Lebanese border, causing shortages of food, medicine and other urgent supplies.” CNA, August 25

The Greek Catholics in the village of Reblah may suffer the same fate as Christians in Qusair who were forced to seek refuge in Lebanon recently after their village lost supplies for days thanks to the Free Syrian Army (FSA). The residents were told to leave or face annihilation. They chose to leave.

Mother Agnes Miriam of the Melkite Catholic monastery near Homs provided important first hand reporting on the fate of Syria’s 10% Christian population (July at 3:30 and August 2012). She noted that FSA fighters destroyed six Christian churches in the city of Homs. Due to this and other attacks, up to 90% of the Christian population were forced to flee for their lives without their possessions.

Regarding the FSA, Mother Agnes asked, “Why choose Christian zones as a target?”

United States and NATO Support for those Attacking Christians

On December 11, 2011, Pepe Escobar reported that 600 troops and weapons were shipped from Libya to help topple the Syrian government. This was just part of the NATO-Saudi-Qatari sponsored flow of foreign fightersinto Syria. This was well before Hillary Clinton’s February warning that arming FSA rebels would risk arming terrorist elements among the rebels.

Regrettably, Clinton’s statement was dripping with the cynicism of realpolitic. She and the president knew that the core commanders of the NATO supported Libyan rebels sent to Syria consisted of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIGF). LIGF was a declared ally of al Qaeda well before the Arab Spring movement started in 2011 (Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq, U.S. Military Academy). She also knew that Saudis and Qatar were sponsoring Wahhabi fighters, the most extreme of the anti-Christian Muslim religious zealots.

Libyans and other foreign Islamic extremists flocking to Syria are welcomed at a special NATO-Saudi-Qatari “nerve center” in Adana, Turkey (near Aleppo, Syria). Just a few miles from embattled Aleppo, Syria, the center directs “vital military and communications aid to Syria’s rebels” as they kill and maim to advance their cause.

Ironically, FSA tactics mirror those used to condemn Saddam Hussein: the use of human shields in military operations. The rebels moved into Syria’s three largest cities, attacked local authorities (with very limited support from residents), and incurred the inevitable military response of the ruling government. The rebels can’t win a battle in the open field. By using the urban population as a shield, the FSA avoids the risks of an open battle with the regime. (Image: Monastery of St. James)

Blessed are the peacemakers?

Political leaders in the United States embrace Christianity as an article of political faith. Few prominent leaders are without a specific religion and an endorsement by their local pastor, priest, etc. They display their faith in public and talk about how it rules their life. Yet:

  • George Bush, the self-proclaimed Christian president, showed little regard for the fate of Iraqi Christiansafter the illegal invasion and occupation;

  • Barak Obama failed to take into account the suffering of Syrian Christians when he sent Hillary Clinton all over the world to gain assistance for the Syrian rebels; and

  • Under both presidents, Congress failed to do anything more than hold a brief hearing or two where the issue was raised.

Being a Christian in the Middle East carries special challenges. You are an identified minority. You are subject to special laws that limit your rights. Worse, during times of conflict or even times of peace, your community may be subject to intense discrimination and violence. It is not a comfortable path. It is a commitment based on deep faith and loyalty to the teachings of Jesus.

Politicians claim to follow Jesus but rarely walk the path. They must be called to account. Either act on your faith or stop lying. Stop using your religion to get elected and forget everything about it once in office. These politicians should read Jesus’ teachings on peace, expand the principles to all people, and shun intimidation and violence as the first tool of foreign policy.

Senior CFR official : Free Syrian Army needs al-Qaeda support 

 By Elliott Freeman

Aug 27, 2012 in World

A top strategist at the prestigious U.S. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is crediting al-Qaeda forces in Syria with the resurgence of the rebellion against President Bashar Al-Assad's regime.

Download 328.34 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   16

Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2020
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

    Bosh sahifa
davlat universiteti
ta’lim vazirligi
O’zbekiston respublikasi
maxsus ta’lim
zbekiston respublikasi
o’rta maxsus
davlat pedagogika
axborot texnologiyalari
nomidagi toshkent
pedagogika instituti
texnologiyalari universiteti
navoiy nomidagi
samarqand davlat
guruh talabasi
toshkent axborot
nomidagi samarqand
ta’limi vazirligi
haqida tushuncha
toshkent davlat
Darsning maqsadi
xorazmiy nomidagi
Toshkent davlat
vazirligi toshkent
tashkil etish
Alisher navoiy
rivojlantirish vazirligi
Ўзбекистон республикаси
matematika fakulteti
pedagogika universiteti
таълим вазирлиги
sinflar uchun
Nizomiy nomidagi
tibbiyot akademiyasi
maxsus ta'lim
ta'lim vazirligi
o’rta ta’lim
махсус таълим
bilan ishlash
fanlar fakulteti
Referat mavzu
umumiy o’rta
haqida umumiy
Navoiy davlat
Buxoro davlat
fanining predmeti
fizika matematika
universiteti fizika
malakasini oshirish
kommunikatsiyalarini rivojlantirish
jizzax davlat
davlat sharqshunoslik