Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School
The Effectiveness of Physical Activity and Physical Education Policies and
Programs
337
Programs with more structure and supervision have been found to
generate more physical activity among participants (Beets et al., 2012b). As
with sports, Trost and colleagues
(2008b) found that elementary-age boys
were more likely than girls to engage in physical activity during after-school
programs.
Impact on Physical Activity
The adoption of policies to provide sports programs in schools has
great potential to increase physical activity among students (Kanters et al.,
2013). This holds true for disparate populations, including rural,
inner-city,
and economically disadvantaged youth (Vandell et al., 2007; Edwards et
al., 2012).
Although studies vary in methodology and population, evidence
shows that involvement in sports enhances cardiovascular fitness (Beets
and Pitetti, 2005) and increases the amount of time spent in vigorous- or
moderate-intensity physical activity (Nelson et al., 2005, 2006; Coleman et
al., 2008; Dodge and Lambert, 2009; Graham et al., 2011).
In one study
of sports involving boys aged 6-12, Wickel and Eisenmann (2007) found
that participants averaged 110 minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity
physical activity during a day in which they participated in a sport, com-
pared with only 30 minutes on a nonsport day. Another study, by Leek
and colleagues
(2011), found that youth involved in soccer,
baseball, or
softball teams engaged in a mean of 45.1 minutes of vigorous- or moderate-
intensity physical activity, with variation by sport. Participation in these
programs thus appears to contribute to the overall recommendation of 60
minutes per day of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity for
youth. The authors note, however, that
enhanced policies could ensure sufficient physical activity during practices
by emphasizing participation over competition, sponsoring teams for all
skill
levels across all ages, ensuring access by lower income youth with
sliding scales for fees, increasing practice frequency, extending short sea-
sons, using pedometers or accelerometers to monitor physical activity peri-
odically during practices, providing coaches strategies
to increase physical
activity, and supporting youth and parents in obtaining adequate physical
activity on non-practice days. (p. 298)
Although after-school physical activity programs are growing in number,
their effectiveness in increasing physical activity among participants is unclear
(Beets et al., 2009). Data are limited on physical activity levels in the after-
school period (Trost et al., 2008b), which vary by program and the context in
which the activity takes place (e.g., indoor versus outdoor,
structured versus
unstructured) (Trost et al., 2008b; Beets et al., 2009), as well as implementa-