on the amount of modifier.
Figure 1. shows the dependence of the mass loss
modifier in the “Fire Pipe” for 3 minutes.
Section 7. Chemistry
40
Figure 1. Dependence of the mass loss (%)
on the amount of modifier in the “Flame tube”
for 3 minutes of the obtained slab samples
Figure 2. Dependence of the time
spent on 30% mass loss in the “fire
pipe” on the amount of modifier
Figure 2. shows the dependence of the time taken
for the 30% mass loss in the “fire pipe” on the amount
of modifier.
As can be seen from (figure 1), the combustion
mass loss of the plate has the lowest value (12%)
when the modifier content is 5%. When the amount
of modifier is higher than this, the mass loss rate in
combustion is almost unchanged.
From (figure 2) it can be seen that it took 15 min-
utes for 30% mass loss when the modifier amount
was 5%. There was no significant difference when
the modifier content was 6%. It was proved that the
optimal amount of the modifier is 5%.
Conclusion
The results show that the new type of glue
modified with sodium silicate and silicon-organic
compounds in many respects does not lag behind
phenol-formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde res-
ins. Wood panels based on it are resistant to fire and
moisture, and their strength is not inferior to other
similar types of boards.
The amount of modifier based on the obtained
silicon-organic compound was found to have a sig-
nificant effect on the strength of the product. As the
amount of modifier increases, water resistance and
durability increase. It was found that 5% modifier
was the most acceptable amount relative to the to-
tal mass of glue, and that the strength and water re-
sistance of the resulting product changed very little
when the percentage was higher.
Based on the results of the study, it can be said that
the use of modified adhesives based on organosilicon
compounds for the production of environmentally
safe wood shavings will lead to a major change in the
industry. This will reduce the use of toxic substances
in the production of wood chipboard.
References:
1. Kondratyev V. P. Synthetic adhesives for wood materials / V. P. Kondratyev and V. I. Kondrashchenko. –
M.: Scientific world, 2004. – 520 p.
2. Azarov V. I. Chemistry of wood and synthetic polymers: textbook / V. I. Azarov, A. V. Burov, A. V. Obo-
lenskaya. – SPb.: Lan, 2010. – 624 p.
3. Sokolova E. G. “Modification of phenol-formaldehyde resin with melamine-urea-formaldehyde resin for
gluing plywood” Systems Methods Technologies 2018. – No. 2 (38). – P. 111–115.
4. Ugryumov S. A. “Modification of urea-formaldehyde resin for the production of kostroplit” / S. А. Ugryu-
mov, V. E. Tsvetkov // Woodworking industry. 2008. – No. 3. – P. 16–18.
5. Yu. G. Doronin S. N., Miroshnichenko M. M. Svitkina. Synthetic resins in woodworking. – M.: Forest
industry, 1987. – 159 p.
DEVELOPMENT OF CARBAMIDE-FORMALDEGIDE SMOLA-BASED GLUE COMPOSITIONS MODIFIED WITH SILICON ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
41
6. Ugryumov S. A. Methods of modification of phenolformaldehyde resins used in the manufacture of
laminated wood materials. Review //Adhesives. Sealing. Technologies. 2017. – No. 5. P. 14–19.
7. Rusakov D. S., Varankina G. S., Chubinskij A. N. Modification of phenolic resins and urea-formaldehyde
resins byproducts of pulp production // Adhesives. Sealing. Technologies. 2017. – No. 6. – P. 16–20.
8. Zeli Que. Takeshi Furuno, Sadanobu Katoh, Yoshihiko Nishino. Effects of urea-formaldehyde resin mole
ratio on the properties of particleboard. Building and Environment, 2007. – Vol. 42. – P. 1257–1263.
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.028
9. Fedotov A. A. Investigation of the properties of chipboards based on synthetic resins with various pro-
portions of furan resin additives // A. A. Fedotov, S. A. Ugryumov // Adhesives. Sealants. Technology.
2012. – No. 12. – P. 16–19.
10. Ugryumov S. A., Osetrov A. V. “Analysis of the chemical composition and properties of wood-based
panels based on modified adhesive compositions” Lesnoy Vestnik 4/2016. – P. 40–43.
11. RF patent № 2059663 C1, 08 G 12/12.
12. RF patent No. 2114870 C1, C08 G 12/40, C08 J 9/06.