72
Uzbekistan Country Gender Assessment Update
tashkent, Samarkand, and andijan.
231
the costs of accommodation and transportation to a
higher educational institution might also reduce opportunities for both young men and women.
In Uzbekistan, higher education is mostly fee-based. due to high tuition costs, families
might give preference to sons over daughters. traditionally, daughters marry and move to
their husband’s family, so any investment in a daughter’s education is unlikely to benefit her
own family. However, many middle-income families continue to pay their daughters’ higher
education costs after marriage because grooms’ families are often reluctant to cover a bride’s
tuition cost. additionally, the age of admission at universities coincides with the most frequent
marriage age for girls (18–19 years) and marriage might be prioritized over higher education
for young girls in situations where a choice is to be made between pursuing higher education
and getting married. Young girls-college graduates are unlikely to enter university the following
year in case of failure. Finally, women’s education is affected by their reproductive function:
women in their twenties have the highest rate of childbirth in Uzbekistan.
232
However, growing
awareness of the value of education is changing families’ attitudes. Brides who complete
higher education are in more demand in urban and rural households because of their increased
potential for contributing to the family budget.
233
Gender asymmetry in higher education is also explicit regarding areas of study. Young women
usually pursue schooling in health, education, and other traditionally female areas, whereas
young men dominate in transport and communications, engineering, construction, and other
technical fields. Jobs related to technical fields typically pay more than occupations in fields
considered as traditionally female areas.
In 2006–2013, the portion of female and male tertiary students in engineering, manufacturing,
and construction was 4.5% vs. 27.2%, respectively, and 10.1% vs. 5.5%, respectively in sciences.
234
In comparison with the above UN Women data, a 2016 World Bank study( based on data from
the State Committee on Statistics) reported that women’s participation in higher education
showed little progress according areas of study: 56% in education and culture, 40% in health
care and physical training; 23% in agriculture; 20% in economics and law; and less than 15% in
communication, construction, and transportation.
235
Starting with the 2017–2018 academic year, the State Committee on Statistics plans to add sex-
disaggregation to the enrollment data in higher education, sorted according to area of study.
236
Some causes of gender asymmetry by economic sector include traditional stereotypes for
women’s social roles in the family and society, lack of national and sector policies, and lack of
support in promoting women’s participation in the traditionally nonfemale sectors of education
231
UN Food and agriculture Organization. 2017.
Gender, Livelihoods and Forestry.
Socio-economic and Gender Analysis in the
Forestry Sector in Uzbekistan
. p.12 in press).
232
demographic Institute under the University Higher School of economics. Russian Federation. 2014. demoscope
Weekly. L.a. tzhai
On fertility issues in Uzbekistan
http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0617/analit02.php
233
adB field survey in 2017 in preparation for this CGa update.
234
United Nations entity for Gender equality and the empowerment of Women. 2016.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: