tion and to reactivate tourist flow once a security crisis seems to be over. However,
the efficiency of these campaigns has never been thoroughly investigated. These
communication campaigns were aimed at generating quantity of marketing infor-
mation rather than quality security oriented information. In other words, the strat-
egy has been to focus on the destination’s touristic qualities, while ignoring the need
to change tourists’ perceived risk by conveying security information (Mansfeld,
1999). After all, personal security has become in recent years a leading factor in
tourists’ overall judgment of destinations’ level of attraction (Hall and O’Sullivan,
1996; Poon and Adams, 2000; Cavlek, 2002).
In recent years, therefore, various studies concluded that the provision of infor-
mation on the security situation and on the level of risk to travelers to the affected
destination should be regarded as a prerequisite, and thus integrated into any
crisis-management plan (Cavlek, 2002). This information should be communi-
cated by the various information agents right after a security situation has com-
menced and must flow constantly, while providing updated information on the
events accompanied by proactive risk assessments (Mansfeld, 1999; Thapa, 2003;
Cavlek, 2002). Based on an analysis of many tourism crises in the past two decades,
Cavlek (2002) highly recommends the improvement of accurate information flow
between local agencies and the media. In fact, her information provision strategy is
based on an effort to control the biased reports by the mass media by supplying the
media with information on the security situation and on the steps taken to contain
it (Cavlek, 2002, p. 488). Her postulate that the local tourism industry in affected
destinations must adopt a proactive approach to security and risk information pro-
vision is logical and imperative. However, the assumption that the media will be
more balanced just because it is provided with accurate information on the security
situation seems to be naïve. After all, the mass media is known to prefer the nega-
tive, sensational mode of coverage even if this means conveying a distorted image
of the actual security situation (Weinmann and Winn, 1994). An alternative, and
what seems to be a more innovative and effective approach, is to establish new chan-
nels of security information that will reach consumers and tour operators alike
through other modes of information dissemination, such as the Internet.
In any event, the recommendations on the use of security oriented information
as a crisis-management strategy are still much too generalized and are not related
to the situational constraints and to the choice behavior that characterize both tour
operators and potential tourists. Therefore, there is a need to develop a more
detailed and practical model that takes into account the situational characteristics
and the constraints imposed on tourists and tour operators while engaged not only
in the destination choice process but in all other stages of the travel behavior
sequence. A conceptualization of this framework will be developed in this chapter
after the current pattern of communicating security information has been charac-
terized and critically analyzed.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: