48
world.
71
Special interests involve in drafting legislation, but even if a regulation has
already drafted, special interests still dilute and weaken the regulation. They are also able
to weaken the enforcement of a regulation without changing the regulation. With the
decreasing public concern, special interests can affect repealing a regulation. Sometimes,
they switch regulators if they could not affect existing regulations.
Special interests also
involve in setting rates and prices, which are higher than the market sets. To prevent
these engagements, Etzioni suggests restricting the role of private money in public life.
According to him, legislators are dependent on special interests due to funds. Thus,
reforming campaign-finance law would be helpful to reduce regulatory capture.
Previous studies on regulatory capture focused on the relationship between the
regulatory authority and interest groups. They tend to focus on the game between
government and firms. Although the theory of regulatory capture well explains the effects
of interest groups
on governmental policy, it is limited in showing the political contexts
of policymaking. In this sense, Spiller and Tommasi pointed out the importance of
institutional environment for the behaviors of actors in policymakings.
72
They suggested
several conditions for cooperation for a stable and flexible policy. The conditions include
small number of key actors, strong intertemporal
linkage between the actors, observable
political moves. This shows that regulations are difficult to be understood as a pure game
of government and firm.
71
Etzioni, Amitai. "The capture theory of regulations—Revisited." Society 46, no. 4
(2009): 319-323.
72
Spiller, Pablo T., and Mariano Tommasi. "The institutions of regulation: An
application to public utilities." in
Handbook of New Institutional Economics
, ed. Claude
Menard and Mary M. Shirley (Springer, 2005). 515-543.
49
Embeddedness of multinational corporations
Current globalization of industries is raising doubts
on the concept of an
organizational field. A number of studies have suggested that an organizational field
operates in different ways for multinational corporations (MNCs). Although
neoinstitutional models consider endogenous changes by adopting the institutional
entrepreneurship, they still focus on external institutional pressures, which come from
fields. As MNCs operate across diverse national institutions and are consist of multiple
subsidiary units, organizational fields of MNCs are hard to be defined. In
other words,
the institutional environments of them are multiple, fragmented, and conflicting each
other rather than granted and static fields.
73
Therefore, institutional pressures for MNCs
are weak and diverse. Under multiple institutional environments,
MNCs select to what
extent they will be embedded in the environments in which they operate.
74
In this sense, for MNCs, social environments are evolving rule system, which are
“products of a continuous process of sensemaking, enactment,
and negotiated political
interactions”.
75
Legitimacy is constructed by political processes, and power plays an
important role in the dynamics of institutions. Powerful business and financial
organizations can change the relationship between institutions and organizations. These
organizations can “reverse-legitimate” institutions like institutions legitimate
73
Kostova, Tatiana,
Kendall Roth, and M. Tina Dacin. "Institutional theory in the study
of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions."
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: