The World\'s Most Dangerous Secret Societies: The Illuminati, Freemasons, Bilderberg Group, Knights Templar, The Jesuits, Skull And Bones And Others pdfdrive com

Chapter Eight: THE COMMITTEE OF 300
So far to date, we have chosen to examine secret societies that are rooted in
incontrovertible historical evidence. Other examples of secret societies
throughout history, such as the White Dragon Society, the Order of Nine Angles,
the Knights of the Golden Circle, the Esoteric Order of Dagon and the Order of
the Palladium and the Four Pi Society mentioned in this book’s introduction,
have been omitted either because their existence has been proven to be a hoax,
evidence for their existence is tenable at best or their influence is so marginal as
to have virtually no effect whatsoever on the world at large.
When it comes to the Committee of 300, we are straddling the line between
fiction, exaggeration and historical possibility.
In literature pertaining to secret societies and conspiracy theories, the
Committee of 300 is sometimes overlooked or understated. Certain researchers
simply assume that the Committee is simply another code-name for Illuminati,
and use it interchangeably. Still others have pointed out critical flaws in existing
theories behind the Committee’s existence, such as texts which have proven to
be forgeries. Still others have meticulously pieced together historical evidence
that links many of the figures we have discussed to date with the alleged origins
of the Committee itself; and it is this last factor that is of particular interest to us.
The correlation between industrialization, media communication, economic
control and globalization has been amply demonstrated throughout history, and
was present even as early as the dawn of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th
century (coincidentally, a period that saw the rise of both Freemasonry and the
Illuminati.) Parallel to this has been an increase in global population growth,
which British economist and scholar Thomas Malthus predicted as early as 1798
would ultimately result in what has come to be known as a ‘Malthusian
catastrophe’; in which both natural causes, such as famine, starvation and
disease as well as artificial constructs such as war, poverty and violence would
be inevitable conclusions that were fundamentally cyclical results necessary to
redress this expansion in population growth when faced with a scarcity of
resources. The reason this highly controversial conclusion is brought up here is
not just to reinvigorate long-dormant economic theories, but so the reader will

---

have a bit of context when addressing the plausibility of certain long-scale plans
of the Committee of 300.
World population statistics indicate that the 2014 global census was estimated 
at roughly 7 Billion people. The World Health Organization predicts an 
incremental increase of approximately 10% every 5 years; meaning that by 2029, 
we could be facing a global population of 9 Billion. With both global economic 
disparity at an all-time high, crises of food shortages, incessant and transglobal
conflicts and the spread of highly contagious viral diseases such as Ebola, the
question isn’t whether or not Malthus was right, but whether or not we can
afford not to entertain the ramifications of the existence of the Committee of
300?