The World\'s Most Dangerous Secret Societies: The Illuminati, Freemasons, Bilderberg Group, Knights Templar, The Jesuits, Skull And Bones And Others pdfdrive com

The Bilderberg Group
Within the realm of overt secret societies, the Bilderberg Group enjoys a
certain notoriety as operating under policies of exclusivity and privacy.
Paradoxically, it has never denied its existence, and lists annual members and 
chairmen of its conferences openly, even publishing its findings and reports. Yet 
surrounding them remains a veil of secrecy and elitism that causes the casual 
observer to ponder what the real motivations are behind their seemingly 
diplomatic and benevolent facade.
The Bilderberg conferences were established in 1954 as a private three-day 
conference between approximately 60 leaders of politics, finance and industry 
designed to foster dialogue between North America and Europe. The climate 
between Western Europe and North America was marked by a certain manner of 
distrust and suspicion, owing to the then-burgeoning influence of post-WWII 
and Cold War politics on both sides. Seeking a way in which representatives 
could better establish diplomatic ties, organizer Jozef 
Retinger—a 
Polish
political advisor then in exile from his native homeland by the Communist
regime—sought to contact both top advisors and industry heads from other
European nations, who in turn contacted then CIA-head Walter Bedell Smith and 
Eisenhower advisor Charles Douglas Jackson to lend their support.
Subsequently, fifty delegates from 11 European countries and 11 delegates from 
the U.S. attended the first conference held at the Hotel de Bilderberg in the 
Netherlands from May 29-31 in 1954. The meetings were a rousing success, and 
soon became inaugurated as an annual conference held worldwide, with 
attendees now numbering between 120-150.
Retinger’s background is worth noting, since his background during WWII 
remains unclear. It is clear that he met with top leaders of the Polish 
Underground who were then under Soviet annex in 1944. Yet certain factions 
viewed him with mistrust; was he working on behalf of German occupying 
forces? Allied forces? The then-exiled Prime Minister Wladyslaw Sikorski?
The question remained unclear, and he survived several assassination attempts 

---

before his exile in 1947. What is known is that both Sikorski and Retinger were
strong supporters of a European unification, and that the latter helped found both
the Council of Europe (a concept which was wholeheartedly proposed and
embraced by British Prime Minister—and Freemason—Winston Churchill as
early as 1943) and the European Movement International between 1947 and
1949; both of which are direct precursors to the current European Union.
Briefly put, both organizations were strong promoters of the concept of a 
fully integrated and centralized “United States of Europe” in which a centralized 
European parliament and Constitution would be directly applicable to all citizens 
under its purview, regardless of which respective national region they dwelled 
in, each subject to applicable centralized law and edict. Enlisting various high-
level industrialists and lobbyists and directly influencing United Nations 
decisions, these integrated European movements disseminated various think-
tanks—including the Bilderberg conferences— throughout the 1950s until 1993,
when the Maastricht Treaty came into unanimous effect and the architects of a
federalized Europe realized their dream some 50 years later with the emergence
of the European Union.
The similarities between the EU and the concept of synarchy mentioned 
previously in this chapter are altogether striking. True, the former may not 
speak the mystical language of enlightened despotism (proposed as early as 370 
BC by Plato in his 
Republic
) guiding man’s evolution through direct reign and
control, but the notion of a singular law, a singular constitution, a singular
government all betoken the same quest for omniscient power as predicted by
D’Alveydre as early as 1887 (which owes more than a tip of the hat to the initial
influence of a central federalized government proposed by the Masonic founding 
fathers of the U.S.) In fact, one can’t help to think of the ghost of D’Alveydre 
smiling as he stood in line at the Euro Disney in 1992, knowing that his initial 
seed would come into full fruition less than one year later. Tyrants can be such 
thoughtfully patient gardeners at times, indeed.
These days, the heads and attendees of Bilderberg conferences have included 
owners from the Washington Post and New York Times; heads of IBM, Google, 
Unilever, Goldman Sachs, Nestle, BP and Barclays Bank; heads of the Federal 
Reserve Bank, the World Trade Organization, the Council on Foreign Relations 
and the Department of Defense; and even foreign royalty and presidents (in a 
largely symbolic gesture, we presume.) And yet despite this level of combined 

---

wealth and prestige, economic disparity both in the U.S. and internationally is at 
an all-time high; medical and disease-borne crises remain at critical levels; and 
the effective notion of high-level surveillance techniques has been proven not to 
be a flight of fancy, but an orchestrated tactic used by several governments—all 
of whom represent supposedly democratic interests.
And yet, these multinational corporations continue to see record profits,
international tax loopholes, increased presence and a suspiciously high degree of
lobbying influence. Wars are fought solely along broadly established economic
lines, sanctions are placed into effect, and policies that directly affect public
safety are implemented without public approval or knowledge.
With this in mind, shall we be so quick to rashly dismiss D’Alveydre as a
crackpot?