Read On.
Get On.
campaign, in the next decade close to
1.5 million children will turn 11 without being able
to read well.
30
England has the highest level of inequality in reading
levels between better-off and less affluent children
in Europe, with the exception of Romania,
31
and
there are also big variations in children’s reading
ability across England. In the best areas, nearly nine
out of ten 11-year-olds can read well; in the weakest
AREASJUSTSIXOUTOFTENCHILDRENAREREACHINGTHIS
benchmark.
32
The performance of the strongest areas
shows that there are no excuses why nearly every
child, including those growing up in poverty, cannot
learn to read well, with the right support.
Strong early language skills give children the essential
foundation for learning in primary school. In this
chapter, we set out how this can be built on in the
primary years. Our approach is rooted in the skills
and experience of teachers and school leaders.
In the past, top-down approaches have helped to
raise basic standards in literacy.
33
But as literacy
standards in primary schools have steadily improved,
the challenges now are to address the full range of
complex reasons why some children still fall behind,
to stretch children who have the potential to excel,
and to encourage all children to regularly read for
pleasure. These more complex challenges require
powerful and accountable teachers and school
leaders, not standardised national programmes.
Government should support the work of skilled
professionals, with appropriate resources and
access to the latest evidence on teaching practices,
and hold schools to account for improvements in
children’s attainment – particularly among children
from disadvantaged backgrounds. We are not
calling for substantial new resources for primary
schools because we understand the fiscal challenges
of the next parliament and believe that the priority
for any new investment is in the early years, as
set out above.
"UTTHENEXTGOVERNMENTCANHAVEAMAJORROLE
driving a national focus on reading attainment
in primary schools. Our priorities for the next
government are:
1. Improving the evidence base available to schools
on reading comprehension, learning from the
spread of phonics teaching approaches.
2. Working with schools to develop a new
generation of school leaders for literacy.
3. Focusing school accountability on children
from disadvantaged backgrounds who are
falling behind.
READING POLICY IN
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
Over the last decade, there has been a clear shift
towards teaching younger primary school children
the basics of reading through phonics. This has
rested on a strong evidence base showing the impact
of phonics teaching approaches on children’s basic
reading skills. Independent assessments of the
merits of specific phonics approaches have enabled
3
IMPROVING CHILDREN’S
READING IN
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
3
IMP
R
OV
IN
G
CHIL
D
R
EN
’S
RE
A
D
IN
G
IN
PR
IM
A
RY
SC
H
OO
LS
13
teachers to confidently select the best strategies
for their pupils. In this section, we argue that a
similar approach should now be adopted to embed
the use of evidence-based teaching practices for
reading comprehension.
Phonics is a way of teaching children to read by
identifying the sounds of individual letters and
combinations of letters. Knowing the sounds of
individual letters enables children to ‘decode’ new
words – that is, to work out how to say a new
word using their understanding of how to say
individual letters. This is a precursor to being able
to understand the meaning of the word. There is
significant evidence that phonics is the most effective
way of teaching the basics of reading, particularly for
children aged five to seven.
Phonics became a priority for the previous Labour
government following the Rose Review of early
reading in 2006,
34
and this has continued under the
coalition government. The coalition introduced
the phonics screening check for six-year-olds in
2012. This short, teacher-led assessment is used to
check children’s ‘decoding’ skills and identify those
who need extra support. Just under three quarters
(74%)
35
of children met the expected standard in
2014, up from 58%
36
in the first year of the test.
This substantial improvement is likely to be the
result of several factors. The introduction of the
screening check and the associated national focus
on phonics gave schools a clear steer about which
teaching practices the coalition expected schools to
prioritise. But the government backed this up with
new evidence-based resources to help teachers
identify the best programmes and approaches for
teaching phonics.
37
The Department for Education
appointed an independent expert to develop a set
OFCRITERIAFORJUDGINGTHEPOTENTIALEFFECTIVENESS
of phonics approaches. The full range of phonics
teaching strategies was then assessed against this
criteria and the results published, enabling schools
to easily identify which approaches are likely to have
the greatest benefit for children – and which should
be avoided.
The coalition’s focus on phonics has clearly led
to improvements in ‘decoding’ skills among young
primary school children. However, there has
been less of a focus on the teaching of reading
comprehension, which is particularly important
for older primary school children. Reading
comprehension focuses on improving children’s
understanding of the books and other texts they are
reading. Strong reading comprehension skills make
reading fun, engaging and memorable, and are the
source of children’s wider learning.
Problems with reading comprehension are one
of the main reasons for children not reaching the
expected standard of reading by the age of 11.
38
Most
worryingly, the gap in reading ability between children
from poorer and better-off families starts to widen
significantly after the age of seven.
39
This suggests
that stronger interventions are needed to ensure that
older primary school children, from poorer families
in particular, have more opportunities to build on the
strong foundations provided by phonics.
There is a strong academic evidence base supporting
the use of reading comprehension strategies to
improve the reading abilities of older primary school
children (especially those aged eight and over). The
Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) has found
that these strategies add an average of five months
to children’s reading progress, if used correctly –
which equates to ‘moderate impact’ compared to
the full range of interventions reviewed by the EEF.
40
They are also relatively low-cost, at around £48 per
pupil a year to cover teacher training and materials.
These costs can easily be covered through existing
pupil premium budgets. Reading comprehension
approaches seem to be more effective for boosting
the reading ability of older primary school children
than, for example, phonics.
Reading comprehension approaches typically help
children to understand how different kinds of texts
are structured, and how they can use this to follow a
story or argument. Children learn how to summarise
and clarify what they have learned from a text, and
to identify for themselves sections or concepts
they haven’t understood. They learn how to make
inferences about behaviours or themes that might
be implicit rather than explicit, and to predict what
might happen next in a story based on what they’ve
already understood.
An example of a reading comprehension approach
is a teacher and pupil(s) taking turns to lead a
discussion about a text, with the teacher asking open
questions to check comprehension. Teachers can also
use visual aids like a flow chart to help children map
out the development of a story and the emergence of
key themes. Computer-based tutoring can also help
children work through a text in a structured way and
at their own pace, with individualised feedback.
TH
E
PO
WE
R
O
F
RE
A
D
IN
G
14
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
NEW GOVERNMENT
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |