Declensions of nouns
a-stems
|
Singular
|
M
|
Short-stemmed
|
Long-stemmed
|
ja-stems
|
wa-stems
|
|
N
|
N
|
M
|
N
|
Nom. fisc Gen. fisces Dat. fisce
Acc. fisc
|
scip scipes
scipe scip
|
deor deores
deore deor
|
ende endes
ende ende
|
cneo(w) cneowes
cneowe cneo(w)
|
Plural
|
Nom. fisces Gen. fiscal Dat. fiscum
Acc. fiscas
|
scipu scipa scipum
scipu
|
deor deora deorum
deor
|
endas enda endum
endas
|
cneo(w) cneowa cneowum
cneo(w)
|
NE fish
|
NE scip
|
NE deer
|
NE end
|
NE knee
|
OE pronouns fell roughly under the same main classes as modern pronouns : personal, demonstrative, interrogative and indefinite. As for other groups – relative, possessive and reflexive – they were as yet not filly developed and were not always distinctly separated from the four main classes.
OE pronouns had three persons, three numbers in the 1 st and 2 nd (two numbers-in the 3 rd) and three genders in the 3 rd p. the pronouns of the 1 st and 2 nd p. had suppletive forms. The pronouns of the 3 rd p., having originated from demonstrative pronouns, had many affinities with the latter.
It is important to note that the Gen. case of personal pronouns had tow main applications: like other oblique cases of noun-pronouns it could be an object, but far more frequently it was as an attribute or a noun determiner, like a possessive pronoun, e. g. sunu min, his freader=NE my son, his father.
Declension of personal pronouns
First person
|
Case
|
Singular
|
Dual
|
Plural
|
Nom.
|
ic
|
wit
|
we
|
Gen.
|
min
|
uncer
|
ure, user
|
Dat.
|
me
|
unc
|
us
|
Acc.
|
mec, me
|
uncit
|
usic, us
|
Second person
|
Nom.
|
pu
|
зit
|
зe
|
Gen.
|
pin
|
incer
|
eower
|
Dat.
|
pe
|
inc
|
eow
|
Acc.
|
pec, pe
|
incit, inc
|
eowic, eow
|
Third person
|
singular
|
plural
|
|
M F
|
N
|
All genders
|
Nom.
|
he heo, hio
|
hit
|
hie, hi, hy, heo
|
Gen.
|
his hire, hiere
|
his
|
hira, heora, hiera, hyra
|
Dat.
|
him hire, hiere
|
him
|
him, heom
|
Acc.
|
hine hie, hi, hy
|
hit
|
hie, hi, hy, heo
|
The were two demonstrative pronouns in OE: the prototype of NE that, which distinguished three genders in the sg. and had one from for all the genders in the pl. and the prototype of this with the same subdivisions: pes Masc., peos Fem., pis Neut. And pas pl. They were declined like adjectives according to a five-case system: Nom., Gen., Dat., Acc., and Inst.
Declension of se, seo, pat
Case
|
Singular
M N F
|
Plural
All gendres
|
Nom. Gen. Dat. Acc.
Instr.
|
se pat seo
pas pas pare
pam pam pare
pone pat pa
py, pon py, pon pare
|
pa para pam pa
pam
|
As stated before, the adjective in OE change for number, gender and case.
As in other OG languages, most adjectives in OE could be declined in two ways: according to the declensions, as well as their origin, were similar to those of the noun declensions. The strong and weak declensions arose due to the use of several stem-forming suffixes in PG.
Like adjectives in other languages, most OE adjectives distinguished between three degrees of comparison: positive, comparative and superlative. The regular means used to form the comparative and the superlative from the positive were the suffixes -ra and –est/ost. Sometimes suffixation was accompanied by an interchange of the root-vowel.
The root-vowel interchange in glad goes back to different sources. The variation [a~a] is a purely phonetic phenomenon.
The adjective god had suppletive forms. Suppletion was a very old way of building the degrees of comparison.
Means of form-
building
|
Positive
|
Comparative
|
Superlative
|
NE
|
Suffixation
|
soft
|
softra
|
softost
|
soft
|
Suffixation plus vowel
interchange
|
glad
|
gladra
|
gladost
|
glad
|
Suppletion
|
god lytel
micel
|
bettra lassa
mara
|
bet(e)st last
mast
|
good little
much
|
The OE was characterised by many peculiar features. Though the verb had few grammatical categories, its paradigm had a very complicated structure: verbs fell into numerous morphological classes and employed a variety of form-building means. All the forms of the verb were synthetic, as analytical forms were only beginning to appear. The non-finite forms of the verb had little in common with the finite forms but shared many features with the nominal parts of speech.
The verb-predicate agreed with the subject of the sentence in two grammatical categories: number and person. Its specifically verbal categories were mood and tense. Finite forms regularly distinguished between two numbers: sg. and pl. the category of Person was made up of three forms: the 1st, the 2nd and 3rd. the category of mood was constituted by the Indicative, Imperative and Subjunctive. The category of Tense in OE consisted of two categorial forms, Pres. and Past. The tenses were formally distinguished by all the verbs in the Ind. and Subj. Moods, there being practically no instances of neutralisation of the tense opposition.
In OE there were two non-finite forms of the verb: the Infinitive and Participle. The Infinitive had no verbal grammatical categories. Being a verbal noun by origin, it had a sort of reduced case-system: two forms which roughly corresponded to the Nom. and Dat. cases of nouns.
The Participle was a kind of verbal adjective which was characterised not only by nominal but also by certain verbal features.
Morphological classification of OE verbs
Strong
|
Weak
|
Minor groups
|
Seven classes with different gradation series
|
Three classes with different stem-suffixes
|
Preterite-presents Suppletive
Anomalus
|
There were about three hundred strong verbs in OE. They were native words descendents from PG with parallels in other OG languages; many of them had a high frequency of occurrence and were basic items of the vocabulary widely used in wird derivation and word compounding.
Strong verbs in OE
Classes
|
Infinitive
|
Past singular
|
Past Plural
|
Participle II
|
NE
|
1
|
writan
|
wrat
|
writon
|
writen
|
write
|
2
|
ceosan
|
ceas
|
curon
|
coren
|
choose
|
3
|
findan
feohtan
|
fand
feaht
|
fundon
fuhton
|
funden
fohten
|
find
fight
|
4
|
beran
|
bar
|
baron
|
boren
|
bear
|
5
|
sittan
|
sat
|
saton
|
seten
|
sit
|
6
|
scacan
|
scoc
|
scocon
|
scacen
|
shake
|
7
|
growan
|
Greow
|
greowon
|
growen
|
grow
|
The number of weak verbs in OE by far exceeded that of strong verbs. In fact, all the verbs, with the exception of the strong verbs and the minor groups were weak.
Weak verbs in OE
Classes
|
Infinitive
|
Past tense
|
Participle II
|
NE
|
I
|
styrian
cepan
|
styrede
cepte
|
styred
ceped
|
stir
keep
|
II
|
locian
|
locode
|
locod
|
look
|
III
|
libban
habban
|
lifde
hafde
|
lifd
hafd
|
live
have
|
Several minor groups of verbs can be referred neither to strong nor to weak verbs. The most important of these verbs the so-called preterite-presents or past-present verbs.
Preterite-presents
OE
|
NE
|
cunnan, can, cunne, cunnen
|
can
|
cude, cudest, cudon, cuden, cud
|
could
|
sceal(l), scealt, sculon, scule, sculen
|
shall
|
sceolde, sceolest, sceoldon, sceolden
|
should
|
magan, mag, magende
|
may
|
willan
|
will
|
mot
|
must
|
ag
|
owe, ought
|
Two verbs suppletive. OE gan whose Past tense was built from a different root:
gan – eode – ge-gan(NE go); and beon(NE be).
4. The syntactic structure of OE was determined by two major conditions: the nature of OE morphology and the relations between the spoken and the written forms of the languages. OE
was largely a synthetic language; it possessed a system of grammatical forms which could indicate the connection between words; consequently the functional load of syntactic ways of word connections was relatively small. It was primarily a spoken language, therefore the written forms of the language resembled oral speech – unless the texts were literal translations from Latin or poems with stereotyped constructions. Consequently, the syntax of the sentence was relatively simple; coordination of clauses prevailed over subordination; complicated syntactical constructions were rare.
Questions:
Explain why OE can be called a synthetic or inflected language. What form-building means were used in OE?
Speak on the differences between the categories of case, number and gender in nouns, pronouns and adjectives.
Explain the difference between the grouping of nouns into declensions and the two declensions adjectives.
Point out instances of variation in the noun paradigms. From which stems were the new variants adopted?
Prove the suppletion is an ancient way of form-building that can be traced to PIE.
Find instances of breaking in the principal forms of strong and weak verbs.
Prove that the non-finite forms in OE had more nominal features than they have today.
Key words:
morphology-морфология, сўзларнинг состави ва ўзгариш формалари системаси, грамматиканинг сўз состави ва формаларини ўрганувчи бўлим;
assimilation-ассимилияция, талаффузда сўз тартибидаги икки товушнинг бирғбирига таъсири натижасида ўзаро мувиқлашуви, бирғбирига сингиб кетиши;
category-категория, предмет турларини ёки уларнинг умумий белгиларини билдирувчи тушунча;
strong verbs-кучли феъллар, ўзакдаги унлини ўзгартириш билан ясайдиган феъллар; weak verbs-кучсиз феъллар, ўтган замон ёки II сифатдош формаларинидентал суффикслар –d ёки –t ёрдамида ясайдиган феъллар.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |