Thus, an increase of $1 billion in total commercial bank
reserves has led, over a short period of time, to a $5 billion
increase in demand deposits, and hence in the total money supply
of the country.
If banks remain fully loaned up,
then the amount that, in the
aggregate, they will pyramid on top of reserves can be precisely
known: It is the inverse of the minimum reserve requirement.
Thus, if the legal reserve requirement is 1/5 (total reserves/total
deposits), the banks will be able to pyramid 5:1 on top of new
reserves. If the reserve requirement is 1/10, then the banks will be
able to pyramid 10:1 on top of total new reserves. The amount
banks can pyramid new deposits on top of reserves is called the
money multiplier
, which is the inverse of the minimum reserve
requirement. In short,
1
MM (money multiplier) =
reserve requirement
If the banks remain fully loaned up then, we can alter our
equation for the nation’s money supply to the following:
M = Cash + (total bank reserves x MM)
Since banks earn their profits by creating new money and
lending it out, banks will keep fully
loaned up unless highly
unusual circumstances prevail. Since the origin of the Federal
Reserve System, U.S. banks have remained fully loaned up except
during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when banks were
understandably fearful of bankruptcies crashing around them,
and could find few borrowers who could be trusted to remain sol-
vent and repay the loan. In that era,
the banks allowed
excess
reserves
to pile up, that is, reserves upon which they did not pyra-
mid loans and deposits by the legally permissible money multi-
plier.
The determinants of the money supply under central banking,
then, are
reserve requirements
and
total reserves
. The Central
Bank can determine the amount of
the money supply at any time
136
The Mystery of Banking
Chapter Nine.qxp 8/4/2008 11:38 AM Page 136
by manipulating and controlling either the reserve requirements
and/or the total of commercial bank reserves.
In the United States, Congressional statute and Federal
Reserve Board dictation combine to fix legal reserve require-
ments. Let us see what happens when a reserve requirement is
changed. Suppose that the Fed cuts
the reserve requirement in
half, from 20 percent to 10 percent—a seemingly extreme exam-
ple which has, however, been realistic at various times in Ameri-
can history. Let us see the results. Figure 9.10 assumes a hypothet-
ical balance sheet for commercial banks, with the banks fully
loaned up to the 5:1 money multiplier.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: