Israeli constitution and of other constitutions therefore lies in the political act
The main difference is in the formalism that characterizes German constitutional jurispru-
dence but not Israeli constitutional jurisprudence. See note 47 and accompanying text. I
thank Mattias Klatt for this point.
. More generally my assump-
tion is that the Platonic conception is one of the features of what has been termed the “global
Oxford University Press, 2013) and of what Moshe Cohen-Eliya and I termed the “culture
stituting it with the judges conception of ideal rights, and referring specifically to the terms
“Platonism” as a heuristic). Some aspects of Dworkin’s depiction of American constitutional
law also lend themselves to the idea of the Platonic Conception of the constitution (see
Edward Foley, “Review Essay: Interpretation and Philosophy: Dworkin’s Constitution” (1997)
272
Iddo Porat
9.1. Historical Background: The Constitutional
Story of Israel
9.1.1. First Period: A Promise not Fulfilled, 1948–1992
The history of Israel’s constitutional law is usually divided into two stages:
from the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 until 1992, and from 1992
onwards.
Israel was established in 1948 after a period of thirty years of British colo-
nial rule over Mandatory Palestine. Although in its defining document – the
Declaration of Independence – Israel’s early leadership vowed to adopt a
constitution,
10
this commitment was made without any deliberation or public
debate since the United Nations resolution that provided the formal legiti-
macy for the State of Israel demanded a constitution as a condition for gain-
ing international recognition of the State.
11
However, this promise was not
fulfilled. The initial date that was set in the Declaration of Independence for
the elections for a constitutional assembly was postponed because of the 1948
War, and before the second date arrived, a decision was made – in law – that
the constitutional assembly would also serve as the first parliament of Israel –
the Knesset. The task of drafting and adopting a constitution was therefore
conferred on the first Knesset of Israel – a decision that turned out to be fatal
to the constitution.
At the time the first Knesset was elected, in January 1949, the international
community had already recognized the State of Israel even without a formal
constitution, so that the need for a constitution was put again to question.
The Knesset debated the issue extensively and finally decided, in the Harari
decision of 1950, not to adopt a constitution – at least not at that point. Instead,
the form of government that was adopted by default was a Westminster-like
form of parliamentary sovereignty without a formal constitution, a form of
government which characterized Israel at least until 1992.
10
Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, 1
Laws of the State of Israel [L.S.I.] 3,
4 (1948). The Declaration refers to “the establishment of the elected, regular authorities of the
State in accordance with the Constitution, which shall be adopted by the Elected Constituent
Assembly not later than the 1st October 1948.” See
www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Peace%20Process/
Guide%20to%20the%20Peace%20Process/Declaration%20of%20Establishment%20of%20
State%20of%20Israel
.
11
UNGA Resolution 181, A/RES/181(II)(A
+B) November 29, 1947. Section I.B.10 of the Resolu-
tion provides that “[t]he Constituent Assembly of each State [referring to the Jewish and Arab
states. I.P.] shall draft a democratic constitution for its State.”