The importance of clt in the pragmatic development of language learners

Conclusion

It can be seen that CLT is not the only way of teaching pragmatics explicitly, it just assess great advantages of teaching foreign language through appropriate choice of language in context (pragmatic competence) with the example of this approach. There are also other approaches and methods to supply English teachers with various activities in order to form a good use of competences in language learners. Integrating pragmatics in language classrooms is vital for forming good command of language. With the advent of communicative language teaching in 1980s and 1990s, however, learners became the center of teaching activities in which engagement with authentic, meaningful, contextualized discourses are required. This new trend led to the exploration of integration pragmatics into the classroom.

References

1. 
   David L.Chiesa, U.Azizov(2019). Baktria Press.Toshkent.205p.
   
2. 
   Ian Tudor(2008). The Dynamics of the language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.234p
   
3. 
   Kenneth R.Rose, Gabriele,K(2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
   
4. 
   Lawrence F.Bouton (1996). Pragmatics and language learning. University of Illinois. Monograph Series Volume 7. 219p.
   
5. 
   Nelson,G., Al-Batal,M and Echols(1996)Arabic and English compliment responses:Potential for pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 17, 411-431.
   
6. 
   Norman Fairclough (1995). Critical discourse analysis (the critical study of language). Longman Group limited.
   
7. 
   Savignon, S. J. (1972). Teaching for Communicative Competence: A Research Report. Audio-Visual Language Journal.
   
8. 
   Prof.Dr.Mehmet Demerezen(1991). Pragmatics and language teaching.28sayi:6/281-287