including him. The idea is incredibly humble and relatable. But, Collins does not write with this
same sense of humility as his musings suggest. Collins’ poem is difficult to understand, and his
extended allusions do not help the reader, especially if he or she is not well versed in
canon
literature (as the middle-class masses of the nineteenth century most likely were not). Collins’
references to a “magic girdle” and “solemn tourney” are meant to show how poetic ability is rare
and given to few, but if a reader is unaware of the allusion then the lines can become very
confusing (6, 7).
Looking at this juxtaposition created between humble content and lofty form, it is clear
that the Sentimentalist writers had some sort of purpose in doing this, since it is too blatant to be
simple coincidence. Alas, without a concrete answer from the Sentimentalists themselves,
readers today must rely on their own explanations for
the phenomenon, but, perhaps, some
explanations are closer to the truth than others.
Looking at Collins’ “Ode on the Poetical Character,” one might think the Sentimentalist
writers chose to create a discrepancy between form and content to raise themselves up to the
same level as their famous predecessors. However, their content shows that they do not believe
themselves worthy of
such a position in the canon, but perhaps they still
wished
to achieve such
high standards. In Collins’ play, the speaker (presumably Collins) admits that to try and become
the next Milton is to try “In vain” since “such bliss [was known] to one alone,” yet Collins’ style
in very Miltonian in approach, as demonstrated earlier (72). Collins clearly did not believe
himself to be on the same poetic level as Milton, but by paralleling
his style, Collins was
showing his desperation for achieving such a state. The poem creates the realm of Milton’s
Eden, which is a sort of symbol for poetic ability. The realm is unattainable by Collins since
“curtained close such scene from every future view” (76). Still, like a Christian trying
This study source was downloaded by 100000859114551 from CourseHero.com on 12-12-2022 10:18:40 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/27016086/331-final-essaydocx/
desperately to get into heaven after it has been sealed, Collins continues to try and gain entry into
this realm using his style, even as his content tells the reader he understands the futility.
Gray took this same idea and built on it, using poetry and writing as a means of building
himself up from a lowly position. However, unlike Collins, who was more focused on the end
goal of becoming Milton’s equal, Gray was fixated on using poetry as compensation
for his low
status. In his poem, “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard,” Gray worries about the
“inevitable hour” of death and how he, like all humans, will one day die (35).
Gray is distraught
by this and by his futility in the face of poverty. The only thing that he believes will hold onto
his essence after death is the epitaph that will be placed on his gravestone, which allows the
voice of a person to be heard after death. Even though “The Epitaph,” which is included in the
poem as a hypothetical, declares Gray’s ineffectuality, saying “He gave to Misery all he had, a
tear,” by including an epitaph and by placing so much importance on the idea of the epitaph in
response to death, Gray is admitting that language is incredibly important to him (123). It is for
this reason that Gray chose to write in such an elevated style: it was the only way to
raise himself
up from a humble position. He saw himself as useless in a world that was already structured, but
through language he could go beyond the bounds of society and of human nature in general.
Moving on to Samuel Johnson, it becomes clear that each Sentimentalist writer probably
had their own, personal reason for creating a gap between form and style. Although the theme of
using language to rise above can be seen in numerous Sentimentalist pieces, including Johnson’s
works, the lexicographer brought in the concept of the external world more so than his
contemporaries. In his
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: