The conterbury tales

References

1. 
   Albert Lillian M. (1998). Chaucer and the late medieval world. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-10667-6.
   
2. 
   Benjamin, Helen (1996). The Canterbury tales. Oxford guides to Chaucer (2 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-871155-1.
   
3. 
   Collette, Carolyn P. (2001). Species, phantasms, and images: vision and medieval psychology in The Canterbury tales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.16499. ISBN 978-0-472-11161-9.
   
4. 
   Dogan, Sandeur (2013). "The Three Estates Model: Represented and Satirised in Chaucer's General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales". Journal of History, Culture & Art Research / Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Arastirmalari Dergisi. June 2013, Vol. 2 Issue 2, pp. 49–56.
   
5. 
   Kolve, V.A.; Olson, Glending (2005). The Canterbury tales: fifteen tales and the general prologue: authoritative text, sources and backgrounds, criticism. A Norton critical edition (2 ed.). New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-92587-6.
   
6. 
   No Fair: The Canterbury Tales. New York: Spark Publishing. 2009.
   
7. 
   Nicolls, Jonathan. "Review: Chaucer's Narrators by David Lawton," The Modern Language Review,2017.
   
8. 
   Pugh, Tison. "Gender, Vulgarity, and the Phantom Debates of Chaucer's Merchant's Tale," Studies in Philology, Vol. 114 Issue 3, 473–96, 2017.
   
9. 
   Pearsall, Derek Albert (1985). The Canterbury tales. Unwin critical library. London: G. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0-04-800021-7.
   
10. 
    Scattered among the nations: documents affecting Jewish history, 49 to 1975. Alexis P. Rubin (ed.). Toronto, ON: Wall & Emerson. 1993. ISBN 978-1-895131-10-9.
    
11. 
    Sobecki, Sebastian (2017). "A Southwark Tale: Gower, the 1381 Poll Tax, and Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales" (PDF). Speculum. 92 (3): 630–60. doi:10.1086/692620. S2CID 159994357.
    
12. 
    Spark Notes: The Canterbury Tales. New York: Spark Publishing. 2014.
    
13. 
    Schwebel, Leah (2014). "The Legend of Thebes and Literary Patricide in Chaucer, Boccaccio, and Statius". Studies in the Age of Chaucer. 36: 139–68. doi:10.1353/sac.2014.0028. S2CID 194954865.
    
14. 
    Saunders, Corrine J. (2006) A Concise Companion to Chaucer. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 19.
    
15. 
    Thomas Tyrwhitt, ed. (1822). "Introductory Discourse to the Canterbury Tales". The Canterbury Tales of Chaucer. W. Pickering and R. and S. Prowett. p. 126 note 15. ISBN 978-0-8482-2624-4.
    
16. 
    The Abbey Scientists' Hall, A.R. p9: London; Roger & Robert Nicholson; 1966.
    
17. 
    Thompson, N.S. (1996). Chaucer, Boccaccio, and the debate of love: a comparative study of the Decameron and the Canterbury tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-812378-1.
    
18. 
    Williams, George (1965). A New View of Chaucer. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 55.
    
19. 
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/chaucer_geoffrey.shtml.
    
20. 
    https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/library/files/special/exhibns/chaucer/works.html.
    
21. 
    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Geoffrey-Chaucer.
    
22. 
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Chaucer.
    
23. 
    https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/guilt-and-creativity-in-the-works-of-geoffrey-chaucer(188c155f-69f0-432e-a5cb-aaad3d920e23).html.
    
24. 
    https://www.worldhistory.org/Geoffrey_Chaucer/.