14
WHY YOU SHOULD KEEP A DIARY
Hindsight Bias
I came across the diaries of my great-uncle recently. In 1932, he emigrated from a
tiny Swiss village to Paris to seek his fortune in the movie industry.
In August
1940, two months after Paris was occupied, he noted: ‘Everyone is certain that
the Germans will leave by the end of the year. Their officers also confirmed this to
me. England will fall as fast as France did, and then we will finally have our
Parisian lives back – albeit as part of Germany.’ The occupation lasted four years.
In today’s history books, the German occupation of France seems to form part
of a clear military strategy. In retrospect, the actual course of the war appears the
most likely of all scenarios. Why? Because we have fallen victim to the
hindsight
bias
.
Let’s take a more recent example: in 2007, economic
experts painted a rosy
picture for the coming years. However, just twelve months later, the financial
markets imploded. Asked about the crisis, the same experts enumerated its
causes: monetary expansion under Greenspan,
lax validation of mortgages,
corrupt rating agencies, low capital requirements, and so forth. In hindsight, the
reasons for the crash seem painfully obvious.
The
hindsight bias
is one of the most prevailing fallacies of all. We can aptly
describe it as the ‘I told you so’ phenomenon: in retrospect, everything seems
clear and inevitable. If a CEO becomes successful due to fortunate circumstances
he will,
looking back, rate the probability of his success a lot higher than it
actually was. Similarly, following Ronald Reagan’s massive election victory over
Jimmy Carter in 1980, commentators announced his appointment to be
foreseeable, even though the election lay on a knife-edge until a few days before
the final vote. Today, business journalists opine that Google’s dominance was
predestined, even though each of them would have snorted had such a prediction
been made in 1998. One particularly blundering example: nowadays it seems
tragic,
yet completely plausible, that a single shot in Sarajevo in 1914 would
totally upturn the world for thirty years and cost 50 million lives. Every child learns
this historical detail in school. But back then, nobody would have dreamed of
such an escalation. It would have sounded too absurd.
So why is the
hindsight bias
so perilous? Well, it makes us believe we are
better predictors than we actually are, causing
us to be arrogant about our
knowledge and consequently to take too much risk. And not just with global
issues: ‘Have you heard? Sylvia and Chris aren’t together any more. It was
always going to go wrong, they were just so different.’ Or: ‘They were just so
similar.’ Or: ‘They spent too much time together.’ Or even: ‘They barely saw one
another.’
Overcoming the
hindsight bias
is not easy. Studies
have shown that people
who are aware of it fall for it just as much as everyone else. So, I’m very sorry, but
you’ve just wasted your time reading this chapter.
If you’re still with me, I have one final tip, this time from personal rather than
professional experience: keep a journal. Write down your predictions – for
political changes, your career, your weight, the stock market and so on. Then,
from
time to time, compare your notes with actual developments. You will be
amazed at what a poor forecaster you are. Don’t forget to read history too – not
the retrospective, compacted theories compiled in textbooks, but the diaries, oral
histories and historical documents from the period. If you can’t live without news,
read newspapers from five, ten or twenty years ago. This will give you a much
better sense of just how unpredictable the world is. Hindsight may provide
temporary comfort to those overwhelmed by complexity,
but as for providing
deeper revelations about how the world works, you’ll benefit by looking
elsewhere.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: