2.
Lev Vygotsky and the
‘Zone of Proximal Development’
Throughout the years education has been affected directly from the research in psychology. Soviet psychologist
Lev Vygotsky is one of the most prominent figures in this relationship and his works are mainly on developmental
psychology.
In terms of children’s dev
elopment, Vygotsky believed that social interaction was crucial:
‘Any function in the child’s cultural development appears twice, or on two planes. First it appears on the social
plane, and then on the psychological plane. First it appears between people and as an interpsychological
category, and then within the child as an intrapsychological category. This is equally true with regard to
voluntary attention, logical memory, the formation of concepts, and the development of volition. We may
consider this position as a law in the full sense of the word….
Social relations or relations among people
genetically underlie all higher functions and their relationships ((1960) 1981, p.163 as cited in Berk and
Winsler, 1995, p.12
).’
In order for learning to occur, the child should be in the ‘Zone of Proximal Development’ (often abbr
eviated
ZPD). Vygotsky defines the term
as ‘
the distance between the actual developmental level as determined by
independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under
adult guidance or in collaborat
ion with more capable peers’ (Vygotsky, 1978
, p.86).
Here, “more capable peer”
(MCP) may be an adult (the teacher) or a peer. With the help of MCP, the child can move through the ZPD and can
carry out the tasks that he cannot do by himself and his peer assists him in this process (see Fig.1). As stated in Utah
Education Network (2005, p.11, as cited in Blake and Pope, 2008, p.63
), it is ‘a waste of time to teach kids what
they already know and what they
cannot do without assistance’,
so it can be said that it is the ZPD where children
actually start learning things. Instead of focusing on tasks that they are capable of, the children solve problems that
they cannot do individually; and through collaboration with their peers or adults like teachers and parents, they
develop their mental and cognitive skills.
This view also resembles to Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis in
language learning which is also known as ‘i+1’ theory, in whic
h
i
represents current competence and
i+1
shows the
structure that is a bit beyond the learner’s current level (Krashen, 1982,
p.20-21). Vygotsky also defines the
functions in the ZPD as ‘buds’ or ‘flowers’ of development, rather than the ‘fruits’ (
1978, p.86), and in order for
these functions to be mature, cooperation is essential.
The teacher’s role here is to keep the tasks within children’s
ZPD, or in other words in a level that is slightly above theirs.
For teachers to be successful in this task, “scaffolding”
gains importance at this point.
F
ig. 1:Zone of Proximal Development
915
Merve Bekiryazıcı / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 ( 2015 ) 913 – 917
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |