State information commission, punjab
Download 53,59 Kb.
|
|
Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Ms. Geeta Berry, 61, Hemkunt Colon y, Kailash Part-1, New Delhi-110048. --------Appellant
Public Information Officer o/o Inspector General of Police, NRI and Women Cell, Punjab Police, Phase-VII, Mohali.
o/o Inspector General of Police, NRI and Women Cell, Punjab Police, Phase-VII, Mohali. -------Respondents Appeal Case No. 416 of 2017 Present:- Ms. Geeta Bery, Appellant, in person. Shri Mohinder Pal, ASI and Shri Prabhjit Singh, Head Constable, on behalf of the respondents.
In this case, Ms. Geeta Bery, vide RTI application dated 20.09.2016, addressed to the PIO, sought following information:- (1) Copy of power of attorney of S. Gurbaksh Singh Salariya duly EMBOSSED on 20.01.2006 vide FCR No. 714. (2) Copy of special power of attorney in favour of S. Bajit Singh S/o S. Partap Singh of Amritsar, got registered by S. Harcharan Singh Ranota of Chandigarh in the office of Sub-Registrar, Chandigarh on 11.08.2006 vide Serial No. 1845, Book No. 4, Volume No. 285, Page No. 1420. (3) Action taken report on her complaint by NRI Police Cell of Punjab Police. On receiving no information, she filed First Appeal with the First Appellate Authority on 01.11.2016 and then approached the Commission in the second appeal on 17.01.2017. Accordingly, a Notice of Hearing was sent to the parties for 03.04.2017. 2. On 03.04.2017, a letter No. 6591/RTI/C-2(5), dated 28.03.2017 was received Contd……p/2 AC - 416 of 2017 -2- from AIG Police/Admn.-cum-PIO, NRI and Women Wing, Phase-7, S.A.S. Nagar vide which it was informed that the application with UID No. 20152431 of the appellant was under investigation with Police Station NRI, District Amritsar due to which sought information could not be supplied to the appellant. Shri Prabhjit Singh, Head Constable, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submitted that the sought information related to the year 1948-1949 and the office of Municipal Corporation Amritsar was being shifted to another building due to which the relevant record was not forthcoming. He sought some more time to enable them to supply the requisite information to the appellant, which was granted with the directions that more concerted efforts be made to ensure that the requisite information was supplied to the appellant before the next date of hearing. The case was adjourned for today. 3. Today, the representative of the respondent informs that SHO has sent his Inquiry Report and further action is to be taken by AIG. Thus, final Action Taken Report has not been received as yet. Thus AIG is directed to take further action on the report of the SHO and send a report to the complainant, with a copy to the Commission, before the next date of hearing. 4. To come up on 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for further proceedings. Sd/- Dated : 12.06.2017 ( S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab CC: Assistant Inspector General of Police, REGISTERED NRI and Women Cell, Punjab Police, Phase-VII, Mohali. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Shri Rajinder Singh Sital 296, MIG, Dugri-1, Ludhiana. --------Appellant
Public Information Officer, O/o Additional Director General of Police (Crimes), Punjab, Chandigarh First Appellate Authority, O/o Additional Director General of Police (Crimes), Punjab, Chandigarh.
O/o Assistant Inspector General of Police, Crime Zone, Amritsar. -------Respondents
Present:- None for the appellant. Shri Nanak Chand, S.I., on behalf of the respondents.
In this case, during hearing on 06.03.2017, the respondent submitted a letter No. 107/RTI, dated 28.02.2017 from Assistant AIG-cum-PIO, Crime, Punjab, Chandigarh vide which it had been informed that the complaint of the appellant was sent to AIG, Crime Zone, Amritsar for inquiry and a report had not been received as yet. Therefore, PIO of the office of AIG, Crime Zone, Amritsar was impleaded as a necessary party in this case and was directed to send the report to the PIO of the office of Additional Director General of Police (Crimes), Punjab, Chandigarh so that requisite information could be supplied to the appellant without any further delay. He was also Contd…….p/2
2. On 12.04.2017, the respondent sought some more time to enable them to supply requisite information to the appellant, which was granted and the case was adjourned for today. 3. Today, Shri Nanak Chand, S.I., appearing on behalf of the respondents, Informs that requisite information has been supplied to the appellant. The appellant informs that the provided information is incomplete. Accordingly, he is directed to furnish deficiencies in the provided information to the PIO and the PIO is directed to supply complete information to the appellant after removing the deficiencies, before the next date of a hearing, under intimation to the Commission. 4. To come up on 02.08.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for confirmation of compliance of orders.
H.No. 735 R, Partap Nagar, Bathinda. --------Appellant
Public Information Officer, O/o Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bathinda. First Appellate Authority O/o Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bathinda. ……… Respondents
Present:- Shri Bachan Singh, Appellant, ion person. Shri Davinder Jaura, XEN, on behalf of the respondents.
This case was last heard on 27.08.2014 by former SIC, Shri Chander Parkash, when Shri Tirath Ram, XEN and Shri Ravinder Singla, SDO informed that the matter was under process as a survey was being conducted. They assured that on the completion of the survey, the required information would be given to the appellant. On the assurance given by the respondents, the case was disposed of and closed. Then, the appellant vide letter dated 18.07.2016 brought to the notice of Commission that requisite information had not been provided to him. Accordingly, the case was fixed for further proceedings for 12.06.2017. 2. On 12.06.2017, the respondent submitted a letter No. 937/MTP, dated 20.04.2017 from SE-cum-PIO, Municipal Corporation, Bathinda informing that the Contd……p/2 AC - 2131 of 2014 -2- requisite information had been supplied to the appellant vide letter No 3505/B, dated 26.09.2016. The appellant informed that the provided information was incomplete. Accordingly, the appellant was directed to send the deficiencies in the provided information to the PIO, with a copy to the Commission and MTP was directed to be present in person alongwith complete record to explain the factual position of the case so that complete information could be provided to the appellant without any further delay. The case was adjourned for today. 3. Today, Shri Davinder Jaura, XEN, appearing on behalf of the respondents, informs that available record has already been supplied to the appellant. He submits that on the directions of the First Appellate Authority, fresh survey was got conducted and a copy of Survey Plan has also been supplied to the appellant. The appellant is still not satisfied with the provided information. Consequently, after hearing both the parties, the respondent PIO is directed to submit a detailed report narrating complete factual position of the case. 4. Adjourned to 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for further proceedings. Sd/-
s/o Shri D.C. Gupta, K.No.455, Gillco Valley, Kharar, District SAS Nagar. --------Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer o/o Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Mohali. -------Respondent
Present: None for the complainant. Smt. Harjeet Kaur, Senior Assistant, on behalf of the respondents.
2. Today, the representative of the respondent informs that the requisite information has already been sent to the complainant by registered post and no observations have been received from him. Contd……p/2
3. The complainant is not present during second consecutive hearing without any intimation nor any observations, on the provided information, have been received from him. Taking a lenient view, one last opportunity is afforded to the complainant to send his observations, if any, on the provided information, to the PIO with a copy to the Commission, failing which case will be decided on merit on the basis of documents placed on record. 4. To come up on 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for further proceedings.
Shri Vipan Kumar s/o Shri Krishan Kumar, H.No.319, Ward No.2, New Abadi, Khanna District: Ludhiana. --------Appellant
Public Information Officer o/o the Director, Vigilance Department, Punjab, SCO No. 60-61, Sector: 17-D, Chandigarh. First Appellate Authority, O/o Director Vigilance Department, Punjab, SCO No. 60-61, Sector: 17-D, Chandigarh. -------Respondents
Shri Gurbachan Singh, Superintendent; Shri Avtar Singh, Sub Inspector and Shri Anil Rattan, Constable, on behalf of the respondents. ORDER The case was last heard on 25.04.2017, when the respondent submitted a letter No. 14646/VB/S-14, dated 21.04.2017 from Joint Director Admn.-cum-PIO, Vigilance Bureau, Punjab, Chandigarh vide which it had been informed that a reply had been sent to the appellant vide letter No. 50611/VB/S-14, dated 25.11.2016 by the PIO and then again by the First Appellate Authority vide letter No. 53973/VB/S-14, dated 21.12.2016. Accordingly, the appellant was directed to send his observations, if any, to the PIO, with a copy to the Commission. The case was adjourned for today. 2. Today, the representatives of the respondents inform that the requisite information has already been supplied to the appellant twice and no observations have been received from him. 3. The appellant is not present during second consecutive hearing nor any observations, on the provided information, have been received from him, which shows that he is satisfied with the provided information. 4. Accordingly, the case is disposed of and closed.
H.No.258, Sector-4, MDC, Panchkula. --------Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer o/o Police Station, Zirakpur.
O/o Police Station, Zirakpur. -------Respondents Appeal Case No. 852 of 2017 Present: Shri Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Appellant, in person. Shri Nirbhey Singh, Head Constable, on behalf of the respondents.
In this case, Shri Mukesh Kumar Sharma, appellant, vide his RTI application, dated 03.01.2017, addressed to the PIO, sought copies of complaints filed between 10.04.2013 and 20.04.2013 and a copy of complaint dated 03.09.2016 alongwith Action Taken Reports. On receiving no information, he filed first appeal with the First Appellate Authority on 12.02.2017 and then approached the Commission in Second Appeal on 16.03.2017. Accordingly, a Notice of Hearing was sent to the parties for 25.04.2017. 2. On 25.04.2017, the appellant informed that no information had been supplied to him as yet. Shri Nirbhey Singh, Head Constable, appearing on behalf of the respondents, was unable to explain the factual position vis-à-vis the status of the case. Therefore, SHO, Police Station, Zirakpur was directed to submit a status report through an affidavit, in person, on the next date of hearing and explain the position of Contd……p/2 AC - 852 of 2017 -2- the case so that requisite information could be supplied to the appellant, without any further delay. The case was adjourned for today. 3. Today, the representative of the respondents seeks some more time to enable them to supply the requisite information, which is granted with the directions that complete information be provided to the appellant before the next date of hearing, failing which punitive action under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005 will be initiated against the PIO. 4. Adjourned to 17.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for further proceedings. Sd/- Dated : 12.06.2017 ( S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab CC: S.H.O. Police Station, REGISTERED Zirakpur, District: S.A.S.Nagar. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Shri D.C. Gupta, H.No.778,Urban Estate, Phase-1, Patiala. --------Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer o/o PUDA, Urban Estate, Phase-II, Patiala.
O/o Additional Chief Administrator, PUDA, Urban Estate, Phase-II, Patiala. -------Respondents
Shri Anand Pal, Junior Assistant, on behalf of the respondents. ORDER The case was last heard on 25.04.2017, when the respondent submitted a letter No. 3132-3133, dated 24.04.2017 from the PIO of the office of P.D.A., Patiala, addressed to the appellant, with a copy to the Commission vide which status/reply had been sent to the appellant. The appellant was not present without any intimation. Accordingly, he was directed to send his observations, if any, on the provided information to the PIO, with a copy to the Commission. The case was adjourned for today. 2. Today, the representative of the respondent informs that the requisite information has been supplied to the appellant to his satisfaction. The appellant is not present without any intimation nor any observations, on the provided information, have been received from him, which shows that he is satisfied with the provided information. 3. Accordingly, the case is disposed of and closed. Sd/- Dated : 12.06.2017 ( S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Shri Pawan Kumar Sharma, Kothi No.585, Phase-2, SAS Nagar. --------Appellant
Public Information Officer o/o Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar. First Appellate Authority, o/o Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar. -------Respondents
Shri Ravinder Singh, ASI alongwith Shri Ashish Kumar, Constable, on behalf of the respondents. ORDER The case was last heard on 27.04.2017, when Shri Pawan Dev Singh, ASI and Shri Ashish Kumar, Constable, appearing on behalf of the respondents, handed over the remaining information to the appellant, who sought adjournment to enable him to study the provided information and revert back to the authorities in case of deficiencies. The case was adjourned for today. 2. Today, the appellant informs that he has sent deficiencies in the provided information to the PIO on 20.05.2017. The representative of the respondents submits letter No. 33988/G/RTI, dated 10.06.2017 vide which requisite information/reply has been supplied. He hands over a copy of the information to the appellant, who after perusing the same expresses satisfaction. 3. Accordingly, the case is disposed of and closed. Sd/- Dated : 12.06.2017 ( S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Shri Parveen Kohli s/o Shri Savdesh Kohli r/o H.No.451/2, College Road, Jagraon, District Ludhiana. --------Complainant Vs. Public Information Officer o/o A.I.G. Flying Squad No. 1, Vigilance Bureau, Punjab, SCO No. 49-51, Sector: 17-C, Chandigarh.
o/o Headquarter, Vigilance Bureau, Punjab, SCO No. 60-61, Sector: 17-C, Chandigarh. -------Respondents
Present:- Shri Parveen Kohli, complainant, in person. Shri Gurbachan Singh, Superintendent, on behalf of the respondents.
The case was last heard on 27.04.2017, when the complainant was not present due to ill health. However, vide letter dated 27.04.2017, he informed that the provided information was incomplete. 2. A letter No. 510/AIG-VB, dated 17.04.2017 was received from AIGP/VB, Punjab, Chandigarh enclosing a letter dated 27.04.2016 from Shri Kapil Bansal vide which he requested that the information sought in this case might not be provided to any other person as his life and security would be put in danger. Accordingly, one last opportunity was afforded to the complainant to spell out the public interest involved in seeking the information in this case. The case was adjourned for today. Contd…….p/2 CC - 200 of 2017 -2- 3. Today, the representative of the respondent informs that point-wise information/reply has been supplied to the complainant. The complainant informs that provided information is still incomplete. Consequently, after hearing both the parties and discussing the matter, it is directed that copy of said complaint along with concluding part of Action Taken Report, be supplied to the complainant and the complainant is directed to send his observations, if any, on the provided information to the PIO, with a copy to the Commission. 4. Adjourned to 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M., for further proceedings.
197/20, Pathkana Mohalla, Devi Dawala Chowk, Nabha (Patiala) ……………..Appellant
O/o Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Patiala.
S/o Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Patiala. …....Respondents
Present:- Shri Rajan Bansal, on behalf of the appellant. Shri Rohit Garg, ETO, on behalf of the respondents.
Contd……p/2 AC - 3173 of 2016 -2- 2. As per the directions of the Commission, issued on the last date of hearing, Shri Rohit Garg, ETO, is present today. He reiterates that the said dealers are petty dealers and their firms are not registered under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and therefore no such record is available in their office in respect of the sales and purchases made by them. Consequently, after hearing both the parties, the respondent is directed to supply a detailed reply narrating the detailed factual position of the case, to the appellant along with available record, with a copy to the Commission. 3. Adjourned to 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for further proceedings. Sd/- Dated : 12.06.2017 ( S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Shri Jiwan Singh, Flat No.50-C, Silver Residency Apartments, Khula Kingra, Near Wadala Chowk, Jalandhar-144014. ……………..Appellant
The Public Information Officer, O/o Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar..
Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar. ……………....Respondents Appeal Case No. 2892 of 2016 Present:- Shri Jiwan Singh, Appellant, in person. Shri Rajinder Sharma, ATP, on behalf of the respondents. ORDER The case was last heard on 03.05.2017, when one last opportunity was afforded to the PIO to supply the requisite information to the appellant and explain reasons for delay in the supply of the information, in person, on the next date of hearing, failing which punitive action, under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005 would be initiated against him. A copy of the order was forwarded to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar to ensure the compliance of the orders. The case was adjourned for today. 2. Today, Shri Rajinder Sharma, ATP, appearing on behalf of the respondents, informs that the requisite information has been supplied to the appellant and assures that in case any deficiency is pointed out by the appellant, that will be removed, to which the appellant agrees. 3. On the assurance given by the respondent, the case is disposed of and closed. Sd/- Dated : 12.06.2017 ( S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB Red Cross Bhawan, Near Rose Garden, Madhya Marg, Sector: 16, Chandigarh. Tel. No.0172-2864100-01, Fax No.0172-2864110 Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com Sh. Rajesh Aggarwal, S/o Sh. Ram Saroop, Social Worker & RTI Activist, Hanjra Marg, Indra Marg, Sunam, District: Sangrur. ……Appellant
Public Information Officer o/o Principal Secretary, Local Govt., Deptt, Punjab Municipal Bhawan, Plot No.3, Sector:35/A, Chandigarh. First Appellate Authority, o/o Principal Secretary, Local Govt., Deptt, Punjab Municipal Bhawan, Plot No.3, Sector:35/A, Chandigarh. …..Respondents
Present:- Shri Rajesh Aggarwal, appellant, in person. Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Superintendent-cum-PIO, LG-3 Branch, on behalf of the respondents.
The case was last heard on 03.05.2017, when Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Superintendent-cum-PIO, appearing on behalf of the respondents, informed that information had been sent to the appellant vide Memo. No. 9/47/16-3LG-3/911, dated 12.04.2017, with a copy to the Commission. The appellant was not present without any intimation. Accordingly, one last opportunity was afforded to him to send his observations, if any, on the provided information, to the PIO, with a copy to the Commission, failing which case would be decided on merit on the basis of documents placed on record. The case was adjourned for today. Contd……p/2
2. Today, Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Superintendent-cum-PIO, LG-3 Branch, appearing on behalf of the respondents, informs that in this case erring officials have been chargesheeted and Inquiry Officer has been appointed. The appellant submits a letter dated 12.06.2017 to the Commission with a copy to the respondent vide which deficiencies in the provided information, have been pointed out. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to supply complete information to the appellant after removing deficiencies, pointed out by him. He is also directed to submit a complete report narrating action taken, in chronological order, since the receipt of RTI application. 3. To come up on 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for further proceedings.
Sh. Anil Kumar, 105-E, Jeewan Shanti Niwas, Ranjit Nagar Seeyuna Road, Patiala - 147001. --------Appellant Vs. Public Information Officer, O/o SSSB Punjab, Van Bhawan, Sector 68, Mohali First Appellate Authority O/o SSSB Punjab, Van Bhawan, Sector 68, Mohali. -------Respondents
Smt. Jaswant Kaur,Superintendent-cum-PIO and Shri Ashok Dogra, Senior Assistant, on behalf of the respondents. ORDER The case was last heard on 03.05.2017, when Smt. Jaswant Kaur, PIO-cum-Superintendent had brought complete information for handing over to the appellant, who was not present without any intimation. She submitted a copy of the information to the Commission, which was taken on record. Accordingly, she was directed to send the information to the appellant by registered post and the appellant was directed to send his observations, if any, on the provided information to the PIO, with a copy to the Commission and he was also advised to inspect the record in the office of the PIO on a mutually agreed date and time to identify any other specific document still required by him, if he so desired. The case was adjourned for today. 2. Today, the appellant informs that the provided information is still incomplete. Consequently, after hearing both the parties and with their consent, the appellant is directed to inspect the record in the office of the PIO on 14.06.2017 at 11.00 A.M. to identify the documents required by him and the PIO is directed to supply the same to him on the spot, under intimation to the Commission. 3. Adjourned to 10.07.2017 at 11.30 A.M. for confirmation of compliance of orders. Sd/- Dated: 12.06.2017 (S.S. Channy) Chief Information Commissioner Punjab Download 53,59 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
|
Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha
yuklab olish