Essay Collection For TOEFL Version 1.0 – M
ờ
i b
ạ
n vào
www.dethi.com
để
có thông tin phiên b
ả
n m
ớ
i
employees
filing their nails, making personal calls on the telephone, taking three-hour
lunches, or surfing the Internet for fun.
Finally, the model of capitalism is proving to be the most efficient model that we have
right now. This model of job security completely contradicts the foundations of capitalism.
We can see in the United States now that people
are starting to change jobs, even careers
more and more often. Some career consultants even recommend that employees find new
jobs every three to five years. Even in countries that still offer job security for life, this
model is showing signs of dying out. For example,
in Japan, once famous for its lifelong
jobs, both employees and employers are starting to expect that these jobs will not last a
lifetime. Many of my Japanese friends travel back and forth between the United States and
Japan are have been able to find temporary professional jobs while they are in Japan.
In short, I disagree that companies should offer their employees jobs for life. We can see
this example in some parts of the world and in other
areas in the United States, but these
examples are generally regarded as outmoded ways of conducting business. Finally, the
models of capitalism, even though it may seem cruel, the so-called “law
of the jungle,” are
proving to be the most effective way to raise the standard of living of a country.
(b) I think that businesses should not hire people for entire lives. The business may decline
if it hires people for entire lives. An average life of a person nowadays is about sixty to
seventy years. There is a general tendency that people's mental as well as physical
capabilities decline with increase in age. This results in
decrease in efficiency of
employees. Thus if a business hires employees for entire lives, there is a danger of
decrease in productivity and functioning of the business. To avoid this,
a business must
hire new employees after the current employees term is over.
Besides, one must give opportunities to fresh talents and youngsters. Business is
an activity, which is dynamic. It changes with time. Business can thrive and be successful
only if it understands the present trend and supply what the customer wants.
So the people
who know the present trend and can use it to the business firm's advantage must be hired.
The young generation is normally accustomed to the present trend and they emanate new
ideas that can be useful to the business firm. If a business hires employees for entire lives
then it cannot hire fresh talents, as there will be no vacancies.
Even if the employer who
hires people for entire lives also hire new talents there will be excess employees. This
results in excess cost to hire and maintain them.
I agree that the person who is currently in a firm and served it for many years has
experience and experience counts a lot. But I don’t insist in removing all the experienced
employees at once and hire fresh people who will be novice to the business. The new
employees learn from the existing experienced employees and
gradually develop skill and
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: