Республика илмий-амалий масофавий онлайн конференцияси

Conclusion
When teachers know who the good and less good students are, they can form different groups. While one group is working on a piece of language study (e.g. the past continuous), the other group might be reading a story or doing Internet-based research. Later, while the better group or groups are discussing a topic, the weaker group or groups might be doing a parallel writing exercise, or sitting round a CD player listening to an audio track. This is an example of differentiation - in other words, treating some students differently from others.
Many teachers, faced with students at different levels, adopt a mixture of solutions such as the ones we have suggested here. However, it is vitally important that this is done in a supportive and non-judgmental manner. Students should not be made to feel in any way inferior, but rather should have the benefits of different treatment explained to them. Furthermore, we should be sensitive to their wishes
so that if they do not want to be treated differently, we should work either to persuade them of its benefits or, perhaps, accede to their wishes.
Used literature

5. 
   Block, D. Some thoughts on DIY material design. ELT Journal, 1991, 45(3),
   

211-217

6. 
   Dulay, Burt and Krashen. Edited by Brian Tomlinson. Materials
   

Development in Language Teaching, Second Edition, Excerpt. Cambridge
University Press. 1982

7. 
   Harben, P. T in the language classroom: What is the teacher’s role? On
   

CALL in the 21st century. London: IATEFL. 2001

8. 
   Maftoon, P. Language needs identification: A shortcut. Proceedings of the
   

First Conference on Issues in English Language Teaching in Iran. 2001

9. 
   Williams, M., & Burden, R. Psychology for language teachers, Cambridge,
   

England: Cambridge University Press.1997