always been a marketing focus, the future of Umagic is difficult to predict (who
or goods that have reshaped their industries.
merger boom. The same goes for the money spent on licensing and purchasing
others’ intellectual property. Based on the statistics from Pasadena-based
Patent & Licence Exchange, trade volume in intangible assets in America has
gone up from $15 billion in 1990 to $100 billion in 1998, with small firms and
individuals taking up an increasing share of the rewards.
D And that terrifies big companies: it appears that innovation works
incompatible with them. Some major famous companies that are always known
for ‘innovative ideas’, such as 3M, Procter & Gamble, and Rubbermaid, have
recently had dry spells. Peter Chernin, who runs the Fox TV and film empire for
News Corporation, points out that ‘In the management of creativity, size is your
enemy.’ It’s impossible for someone who’s managing 20 movies to be as
involved as someone doing 5. Therefore, he has tried to divide the studio into
smaller parts, disregarding the risk of higher expenses.
E Nowadays, ideas are more likely to prosper outside big companies. In the old
days, when a brilliant scientist came up with an idea and wanted to make
money out of it, he would take it to a big company first. But now, with all these
cheap venture capital around, he would probably want to commercialise it by
himself. So far, Umagic has already raised $5m and is on its way to another
$25m. Even in the case of capital-intensive businesses like pharmaceuticals,
entrepreneurs have the option to conduct early-stage research and sell out to
the big firms when they’re faced with costly, risky clinical trials. Approximately
1/3 of drug firms’ total revenue is now from licensed-in technology.
F Some of the major enterprises such as General Electric and Cisco have been
impressively triumphant when it comes to snatching and incorporating small
companies’ scores. However, other grants are concerned about the money
they have to spend and the way to keep those geniuses who generated the
idea. It is the dream of everyone to develop more ideas within their
organisations Procter & Gamble is currently switching their entire business
focus from countries to products; one of the goals is to get the whole company
to accept the innovations. In other places, the craving for innovation has
caused a frenzy lor intrapreneurship’ transferring power and establishing
internal idea-workshops and tracking inventory so that the talents will stay.
G Some people don't believe that this kind of restructuring is sufficient. Clayton
Christensen argues in new book that big firms’ many advantages, such as
taking care of their existing customers, can get in the way of innovative
behaviour that is necessary for handling disruptive technologies That’s why
there’s been the trend of cannibalisation, which brings about businesses that
will confront and jeopardise the existing ones. For example, Bank One has set
up Wingspan, which is an online bank that in fact compete, with its actual
page 10
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices
branches.
H There’s no denying that innovation is a big deal. However, do major firms
have to be this pessimistic? According to a recent survey of the to 50
innovations in America by Industry Week, ide as are equally likely to come from
both big and small companies. Big companies can adopt new ideas when they
are mature enough and the risks and rewards have become more quantifiable.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: