Peculiarities of language excavation

Figure 3. The project works results of the experimental groups.
Secondly, I will show the results of each group members. In the group №1 there were 4 student with the same levels of English (Appendix B), all members of group with level Intermediate, and result of group was 92%, in total 11 right answers out of 12. The Group №2 also had 4 members with different levels, but only 1 participant had the Intermediate level. The group had a highest score 12 right answers out of 12. Last Group № 3 consist of 3 students, also with different levels of English, but only one student had the Upper Intermediate level, and other 2 participants had the level Intermediate. In the comparison of three groups, the level of the Group №3 is obviously lower. Furthermore, their project work was not informative and speaking skills were downscale, as the speed of their work. For the other two groups needed more time to present there project, because they had a lots of information and used all new vocabulary in the task. Also, some of girls in the Group №1 had the grammatical mistakes in speech. For example, mistakes in the correct grammatical form of the verbs, but the project was rated high for originality. The bar charts gave the information about the results of the project work after teaching them by the use of the topics in TED Talks and Interview questions (Appendix D).

Group №1

Group №2

Group №3

Daliya

Aksulu

Assel

Gulnaz

Zhanel

Aidana

Shyryn

Arai

Aruzhan

10/10

9/10

9/10

10/10

9/10

10/10

9/10

8/10

8/10