Religion and Humanity in Mesopotamian Myth and Epic
Page
7
of
23
Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Religion. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a
single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).
date: 22 December 2022
Atrahasis and creation
Narratives involving the deluge are critically important to the Mesopotamian view of the history
of humanity,
22
and the nature of human/divine connections. While several literary texts center on
the divine creation of humanity, along with the natural world, the destructive potential of deities
was also the subject of Mesopotamian myth. The Babylonian Flood story
Atrahasis
contains both
creative and destructive relations between humans and deities. The
Atrahasis
narrative (meaning
“surpassingly wise”) takes its name from the human Flood survivor, and is famous for its
correspondence with the biblical Flood account from Genesis. The story of
Atrahasis
is available in
several versions, one of which forms part of Tablet XI of the
Gilgamesh Epic
. The narrative of
Atrahasis
presents a complicated relationship between humans and deities, with an interesting
contrast between the individual and the collective. Relations are shown to vary among deities and
individual humans, and humanity as a whole, as well as between humanity and individual deities
and groups of deities.
The myth begins with the greater deities imposing on lesser deities the menial work of food
production and the building of canals. The arduous nature of the work leads to a rebellion by the
lesser deities; they go on strike and challenge the primary deity, Enlil. The senior deities agree
that the situation requires redress, but also that the rebellion will be punished. Ea (Sumerian
Enki), the god of wisdom, suggests a solution—that the mother and birth goddess, Belet-ili
(“Lady of the Gods”) create a human being to perform the menial duties of the deities. The leader
of the rebellion is killed and his body and blood are mixed with clay to create a human. The spirit
of the dead deity is also mixed into the new creation
23
; the
etemmu
(“spirit”) of the dead god
remains within humanity. The presence of the “spirit” is signaled by the “drumbeat” of the
pulse, which is a constant reminder of the divine contribution to humanity.
24
The mythopoeic
linking of humans and the divine in the constant rhythm of the pulse provides a microcosm of the
interconnectedness of the two worlds.
Belet-ili next establishes sexuality, birth, and marriage in her human creations, so that they may
reproduce themselves, and she is praised greatly for her work. Yet the spread of humanity creates
problems for Enlil, who finds he cannot sleep because of human noise. He sends a variety of
afflictions against humanity: first plagues, then a drought, then a famine. Each time, Ea advises
the humans to stop making offerings to their favorite deities, but to devote all of their offerings to
the deity who could stop the presiding affliction. The deity related to the affliction is in each case
so moved by the upspring of attention that he intervenes to improve the humans’ situation.
While humanity is presented as being at the mercy of the destructive supernatural powers of the
divine, their efforts to emotionally manipulate the deities into assisting them are successful, with
the help of Ea’s guidance. Communicating with deities through offerings is presented as an
effective means of accessing divine support; divine/human communication is foregrounded in
the narrative, yet not all communication is positive.
Rigmu
(“clamor”) is given to humans by the
gods, along with menial work, at their creation, and it is this “clamor” that causes Enlil to try to
destroy humanity. Conversely, Ea encourages the people to communicate with deities to avoid
Enlil’s plagues (through sacrifice, prayer, and making noise), and the success of Ea’s rescue of
humanity from destruction rests on his ability to communicate with Atrahasis through dreams,
22
23
24
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |