Archived: The Educational System in the United States: Case Study Findings



Download 0,66 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet24/137
Sana18.07.2022
Hajmi0,66 Mb.
#818871
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   ...   137
Bog'liq
UScasestudy

Introduction
The federal government does not determine what students should know and be
able to do in any subject at any level of schooling. Rather, the implementations
of standards for students’ performance have been left to state and local authori-
ties. Within the United States, there are 16,000 school districts, each of which is
administered and financed by a local community, and 50 state departments of edu-
cation. In fact, local control has been the defining characteristic of American edu-


16
cation since the construction of the first one-room schoolhouse. As a result, the
level of standards of schools tends to reflect the socioeconomic status of the com-
munities in which they are located: the wealthier the community, the higher the
expectations and the higher the academic standards.
The impetus for the general movement towards higher standards in the area of
education can be traced to the increasing importance in the American economy
of information as opposed to industry. This movement has created the need for
a work force with higher-level skills and knowledge than in the past. The percep-
tion that this need is not being met has resulted in persistent and severe criticism
of the quality of America’s public schools and dismay about international compari-
sons that consistently rank American students at or near the bottom in academic
achievement. Added to these criticisms is the allegation that schools are partly to
blame for the steady erosion of the United States’ position as the world’s pre-
eminent economic superpower. (
A Nation at Risk 
1983) All of these require, the
critics maintain, that academic standards be raised.
One of the driving forces behind the movement for higher standards, as men-
tioned, is the poor performance of American students on international studies of
academic achievement compared to their peers in other industrialized countries.
In a 1991 International Assessment of Educational Progress, 13-year-olds in the
United States ranked near the bottom of the list with an average of 55 percent
and 67 percent correct answers on the math and science assessments. Only two
countries in the comparisons turned in worse performances, while a wide variety
of countries scored significantly better. For example, 13-year-olds in Hungary,
Korea, the former Soviet Union, and Switzerland posted average scores ranging
from 70–78 percent. Germany and Japan were not represented in this survey, but
results of the Second International Math and Science Study put students from both
Germany and Japan well ahead of U.S. students in both science and math.
These international comparisons and pressure from the business sector in the
United States have focused attention on ways in which public education can be
improved. As a result, the discussion of standards for learning and teaching has
grown in magnitude in the United States in recent years as policymakers, legisla-
tors, educators, parents, and community leaders have all grown increasingly con-
cerned with students’ achievement levels.
The word ‘‘standards’’ has been used in many ways during these often-heated pub-
lic discussions. Sometimes the word ‘‘standards’’ has been used to represent estab-
lished levels of achievement; in other instances it has been used to refer to com-
monly shared sets of academic subject content, such as those embodied in state
curriculum guidelines.


17
To understand the influence of standards in the United States we cannot restrict
ourselves to a discussion of formalized rules and regulations governing the edu-
cation system, although national goals and state regulations and guidelines will be
discussed in this chapter. These guides to standards have developed significantly
in recent years, and school districts have felt their influence. Curriculum guide-
lines in particular have been used to set standards in many states and have been
linked to state-administered achievement tests. However, any discussion of stand-
ards in the United States must also include a description of the more informal
mechanisms by which schools maintain and promote desired levels of achieve-
ment. Achievement levels for schools and for students have traditionally been set
by community expectations, and communities continue to influence curriculum
and instructional decisions made at the school level. Standards, therefore, are also
a result of local decisions, such as those governing the selection of textbooks and
those affecting a school’s policy on the promotion or retention of students. These
mechanisms for establishing standards will also be discussed.

Download 0,66 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   ...   137




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish