Applying Theories for Information Systems Research

Conclusion
This is the introductory chapter. It briefly explains how theories are used to 
underpin IS studies to explain humans’ and technologies’ traits, and the in-
terconnectedness between actors in phenomena being studied. The chapter 
introduces why sociotechnical theories should be used to guide explana-
tion on what, when, why, and how factors influence actors or agents in the 
phenomenon being studied. Consequently, this rigorously helps to shape the 
outcome of the study.
The analysis aspect focuses on people’s subjectivity as they continue 
to make use of technology for different reasons. The introductory con-
tent indicates that theories can reveal and facilitate the stability of an IT 
environment and that continuous change of technologies is subject to hu-
man actions. Hence, examining human actions and their manifestation is 
critical, using different sociotechnical theories. As discussed in the remain-
der of the book, theoretical lenses are intended to assist researchers to gain 
a deeper understanding of the phenomena that they study. 
References
Blanton, J. E., Watson, H. J., & Moody, J. (1992). Toward a better understanding of 
information technology organization: A comparative case study. MIS Quarterly, 
16(4), 531–555.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University 
Press.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of the sociology of translation: Domestication of 
the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law (ed.), A new sociology 
of knowledge, power, action and belief, pp. 196–233. London: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: J. Law (ed.), A 
sociology of monsters. Essays on power, technology and domination, pp. 132–164. 
London: Routledge.

---

12 Introduction
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance 
of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer 
technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 
35(8), 982–1002.
Doolin, B., & Lowe, A. (2002). To reveal is to critique: actor–network theory and 
critical information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 
69–78.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on 
 activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley 
Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
Galliers, R. D., Markus, M. L., & Newell, S. (2006). Exploring information systems 
research approaches: Readings and reflections. New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. 
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2015). Technological change in developing countries: 
Opening the black box of process using actor–network theory. Development 
 Studies Research, 2(1), 33–50.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in informa-
tion systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
Iyamu, T., & Roode, D. (2012). The use of structuration theory and actor network 
theory for analysis: Case study of a financial institution in South Africa. In: A. 
Tatnall (ed.), Social influences on information and communication technology inno-
vations, pp. 1–19. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information 
systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127–157.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and inter-