Ethical issues in moral and social enhancement


The ‘category mistake’ argument examined



Download 1,52 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet40/132
Sana03.06.2022
Hajmi1,52 Mb.
#631209
1   ...   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   ...   132
Bog'liq
FULL TEXT

5.3.1. The ‘category mistake’ argument examined
 
In a somewhat purified form, the category-mistake critique of medicalization states 
that it is epistemically incorrect to see life problems as medical ones. This argument 


77 
relies on an assumption that there are problems that are appropriately seen as 
medical or not. Yet, as with many issues, there are several perspectives that one 
could take on them. For example, the observation that people of lower 
socioeconomic status tend to have worse health can be construed as a moral, 
political, health or economic problem. Similarly, explaining the causes and 
conceptualizing criminal behaviour may include referring to moral failure of 
individuals, condition known as psychopathy or asocial personality disorder, 
economic and social factors (‘the mad’, ‘the bad’, and ‘the disadvantaged’ 
explanations). 
All those ways of looking at it put the stress on one aspect of the problem, and this 
may lead to different kinds of solutions. We might evaluate the usefulness of one or 
another focus, but we would be hard pressed to point to some objective ‘essence’ of 
a problem that makes it 
inherently
political, moral or economic. Similarly, sadness, 
shyness and criminal behaviour may be approached from different perspectives. 
While some perspectives may be more useful or feel more comfortable than others, 
given that it is unlikely that there is something inherent in the way the world is 
structured that would force us to adopt one and not another perspective, an 
essentialist position is hardly justified. Thus, this critique needs an additional 
assumption to hold any ground.
Another weaker version of this critique of medicalization points to the concern that 
that the medical way of framing issues, while not a category mistake in the way that 
saying ‘I am my body’ is, tends to push out other approaches. The critic may accept 
that we need both ways of looking at ourselves to get what we want or need, but 
worry when this interpretation is taking over. This claim is more plausible, but it 
has to be 1) justified empirically to show that the mentioned ‘replacing’ of 
perspectives actually happens and 2) shown that an alternative construction of a 
problem is valuable in some way and should not be lost. This is rarely demonstrated 
or argued for, and thus significantly weakens the ethical appeal of the 
medicalization arguments.
Perhaps the issues surrounding medicalization are best seen to relate to power and 
economy. Firstly, we might justifiably raise a question about who is in the best 


78 
position to make a difference and get us what we want. For example, even if 
sadness or shyness are normal and usual responses to our wider life circumstances, 
and being spotty or impotent are not ‘medical problems in their essence’, where 
doctors are in a position to provide some solutions, we might accept medicalization 
and the treatment of those conditions as ‘illnesses’ rather than wait for the access to 
those drugs to be deregulated and demedicalized.
In this context, it is worth asking whether access to certain goods and tools needs to 
be mediated by the medical profession, or whether it would be better to leave it up 
to the individual to decide. For example, we might think that some kinds of 
pharmacological birth control should be as widely and easily available as condoms, 
or we might think that for various reasons (control of side effects, picking a method 
from a wider array of choices, including ones that involve a minor surgical 
procedure, better promotes choice and safety) it is an all-things-considered better 
policy to provide it via the available medical infrastructure.
Moreover, insofar as medicine provides effective solutions to what troubles us, 
medicalization may simply serve the purpose of implicitly designating who has the 
skill or technology to intervene. This can come together with certification of those 
who provide those solutions – qualified doctors. Certification is not uncommon in 
different areas – for example, regulation and law may only permit qualified 
electricians set up new electrical installations. Certification gives a 
prima facie
reason to have a somewhat greater degree of confidence in a practitioner’s skill than 
when no certification is present. It thus also brings a certain social benefit.
Another issue arises where medical professionals act as ‘gatekeepers’ and thus have 
control over the access to technology. It is hard to say how this would play out in 
the scenario of moral and social enhancement. Access to new reproductive 
technologies, neuroscientific self-experimentation, as well as, for example, deep 
brain stimulation depends on the the ability to find a medical professional that is 
willing to provide the technology. This makes it a matter for the medical profession 
and, despite some decline in the power of that profession, still involves dilemmas 
related to the exercise of power and discretion by medical professionals 
(Pacholczyk, 2011).


79 
The second question is about economy – how do we get what we want in a cheap, 
easy and effective way which maximises benefits while offering the opportunity of 
managing costs or side-effects. Providing birth control through medical 
professionals may simply be the best way of maximising the benefits given the 
social systems and structures currently in place (e.g. collective subsidising or 
covering the cost, expert assistance in decision-making, managing and following up 
on side-effects). While that may mean that birth control and the prevention and 
remedying of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is medicalized, this does not 
prevent an individual from participating in the choice of non-medicalized birth 
control methods or preventing STIs in non-medicalized ways, nor does it mean that 
the sphere of our sexuality has been somehow washed off all other (i.e. non-
medical) meanings.

Download 1,52 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   ...   132




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©hozir.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling

kiriting | ro'yxatdan o'tish
    Bosh sahifa
юртда тантана
Боғда битган
Бугун юртда
Эшитганлар жилманглар
Эшитмадим деманглар
битган бодомлар
Yangiariq tumani
qitish marakazi
Raqamli texnologiyalar
ilishida muhokamadan
tasdiqqa tavsiya
tavsiya etilgan
iqtisodiyot kafedrasi
steiermarkischen landesregierung
asarlaringizni yuboring
o'zingizning asarlaringizni
Iltimos faqat
faqat o'zingizning
steierm rkischen
landesregierung fachabteilung
rkischen landesregierung
hamshira loyihasi
loyihasi mavsum
faolyatining oqibatlari
asosiy adabiyotlar
fakulteti ahborot
ahborot havfsizligi
havfsizligi kafedrasi
fanidan bo’yicha
fakulteti iqtisodiyot
boshqaruv fakulteti
chiqarishda boshqaruv
ishlab chiqarishda
iqtisodiyot fakultet
multiservis tarmoqlari
fanidan asosiy
Uzbek fanidan
mavzulari potok
asosidagi multiservis
'aliyyil a'ziym
billahil 'aliyyil
illaa billahil
quvvata illaa
falah' deganida
Kompyuter savodxonligi
bo’yicha mustaqil
'alal falah'
Hayya 'alal
'alas soloh
Hayya 'alas
mavsum boyicha


yuklab olish