An Introduction to Applied Linguistics

3.9 The linguist and the applied linguist
In spite of their main interest in gender-in-language, linguists also work at the other
end on language-in-gender, where their theoretical concern with the change in
language that is led by gender becomes a concern to intervene against the perceived
injustice of linguistic sexism. Interestingly, and of course paradoxically, the act of
intervention contravenes what we have suggested is their linguistic concern, that is
Language and language practices 53
02 pages 001-202:Layout 1 31/5/07 09:31 Page 53

---

with change. That is to say: if language is of its nature variable, over time and space,
which might be called the linguistic creed, then any attempt to fix it, what Swift
referred to as ‘ascertaining’, will necessarily fail. What must happen, surely, is that
even those changes which are accepted very soon become overtaken by new non-
deliberate changes, which may very well return the language in gender relation to the
status quo, unless in the meantime those non-linguistic power relations themselves
change and so render nugatory their operationalising in language.
The skills the two professional groups call on in these areas are not all that dis -
similar; it would be surprising if they were since (as we have seen before) the linguist
may also work at the applied end and the applied linguist may research the area of
some aspect of gender in language – although, as we have seen, always with some
ameliorative outcome in view. But at the poles the skills and techniques are different:
the linguist will analyse, survey and interview. The applied linguist will test, observe
and, above all, evaluate. But more than anything the applied linguist, unlike the
linguist, will examine the language in gender situation in context and consider any
proposed remedy in terms of the history of the area and of the effects on the stake -
holders’ interest in the language of that situation. We might propose that the linguist
operates deductively and the applied linguist inductively; while reminding ourselves
that deduction and induction cannot stand alone; each requires the other.