191
References
Internet Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom, Available:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.
cfm?abstract_id=1926431
[10.12.13].
Bowden, C., 2013. The US surveillance programmes and their impact on EU citizens' funda-
mental rights, Study for the European Parliament, PE 474.405, 15 October 2013.
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Loewenstein, G., 2010. Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and
the Control Paradox. Internet, presented at the 9th Annual Workshop on the Economics of
Information Security, Cambridge, MA, USA.
http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti/papers/
acquisti-SPPS.pdf
[15.02.13].
Brown, I., 2012. Government access to private-sector data in the United Kingdom. Int. Data
Privacy Law 2 (4), 230–238.
Brown, I., 2013. Lawful Interception Capability Requirements.
Computers & Law
, Aug./Sep.
2013.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2309413
.
Brown, I., 2013 Expert Witness Statement for Big Brother Watch and Others Re: Large-Scale
Internet Surveillance by the UK. Application No: 58170/13 to the European Court of
Human Rights.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2336609
, Sept. 27,
[31.01.14].
Bygrave, A.L., 2002. Data Protection Law. Approaching Its Rationale, Logic and Limits,
Kluwer Law International. London, New York, The Hague.
Cannataci, J.A., Caruana, M. Report: Recommendation R (87) 15—Twenty-five years down
the line.
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2013/oct/coe-report-data-privacy-in-the-police-
sector.pdf
[31.01.14].
Cannataci, J.A., 2013. Defying the logic, forgetting the facts: the new European proposal for
data protection in the police sector. Eur. J. Law Technol. 3 (2). Available:
http://ejlt.org/
article/view/284/390
.
Canadian Goldcorp Inc. case at
http://www.ideaconnection.com/open-innovation-success/
Open-Innovation-Goldcorp-Challenge-00031.html
[Sept. 10, 2013].
Cate, F.H., Cate, B.E., 2012. The Supreme Court and information privacy. Int. Data Privacy
Law 2 (4), 255–267.
Cate, F.H., Mayer-Schönberger, V., 2012. Notice and Consent in a World of Big Data.
Microsoft Global Privacy Summit Summary Report and Outcomes.
http://www.microsoft.
com/en-au/download/details.aspx?id=35596
[15.09.2013].
Cate, F.H., Dempsey, J.X., Rubinstein, I.S., 2012. Systematic government access to private-
sector data. Int. Data Privacy Law 2 (4), 195–199.
Cate, F.H. The failure of fair information practice principles. In: Winn, J. (Ed.), Consumer
Protection in the Age of the Information Economy. Aldershot-Burlington, Ashgate, 2006,
pp. 343–345.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1156972
.
Clarke, R., Morell, M., Stone, G., Sunstein, C., Swire, P., Liberty and Security in a changing
World, Report and Recommendations of The President’s Review Group on Intelligence
and Communications Technologies.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
docs/2013-12-12_rg_final_report.pdf
[31.01.14].
Commission of the European Communities, 2009. Communication from the Commission to
the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee
and the Committee of the Regions, October 28.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/
LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0479:FIN:EN:PDF
[31.01.14].
Congressional Research Service. CRS Report for Congress, 2008. Data Mining and Homeland
Security: An Overview.
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL31798.pdf
[10.12.13].
Conway, S., 2014. Big Data Cloud Delivers Military Intelligence to U.S. Army in Afghanistan,
in Datanami, 6 February 2012.
http://snurl.com/284ak5j
[31.01.14].
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |