Carbon curiosity
Massive stars with an orbiting partner
star shed on average about twice as much
carbon as loner stars do,
Ken Croswell
reported in “How stars turn into carbon
factories,” (
SN: 12/18/21 & 1/1/22, p. 12
).
When a massive star with a partner
explodes, its carbon is cast into space,
Croswell
reported. On the other
hand, a single star’s core would have
destroyed much of its carbon before
such an explosion. Reader
Bill
Camenga
wanted to know what
becomes of the carbon in single stars.
“The carbon doesn’t just vanish,”
Croswell
says. During a single star’s
life, most of its carbon gets trans-
formed into oxygen. When the star
explodes, that oxygen is cast into space,
helping make oxygen the third most
abundant element in the universe
after hydrogen and helium. The exact
nuclear reaction, he says, is carbon-12 +
helium-4
→
oxygen-16 + energy.
X-ray! X-ray! Read all about it!
In 1971, the first X-ray CT scan of a
patient provided an unprecedented image
of the human brain. Fifty years later,
CT scans are still saving lives and helping
researchers better understand the world
around us,
Conover'>Emily Conover
reported in
“Celebrating 50 years of CT scans”
(
SN: 12/18/21 & 1/1/22, p. 44
).
Several readers wondered whether
radiation from CT scans should be a
concern for those receiving them.
Scientists have continually
improved CT technology over the
years, not only making it faster and
higher resolution, but also decreasing
the amount of radiation that people
receive,
Conover
says. Although CT
scans typically expose patients to
more radiation than standard X-ray
imaging, the amount of radiation
from one scan is still relatively small.
Depending on the type of CT scan, the
radiation received may be less than
the average background radiation a
person gets from various sources in
the environment over a year, she says.
There is still debate among sci-
entists about the potential health
effects of such low doses of radiation,
Conover
says. When a doctor orders a
CT scan, they typically will have deter-
mined that the benefit to the patient
outweighs the small risk.
Correction
In “Pointed takedown of the mam-
moth hunters” (SN: 1/15/22, p. 22),
archaeologist Vance Holliday of the
University of Arizona in Tucson, not
Vance Haynes , weighed in on archae-
ologist Metin Eren’s hypothesis that
ancient Clovis points were not used
for hunting the tusked beasts.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |