Bank of baroda

Sr.No.
Name and No. of the case
Nature of dispute
Amt. involved
1.
CGIT, Mumbai No.76 of 2004 -
Contract workmen engaged in cleaning services
Nil
George & Modern Maintenance
seeking regularisation in UTI. (60 workmen)
Services Vs.UTI
(arising out of W.P.No.61 of 1996)
2.
CGIT, Mumbai No: 77 of 2004 -
Contract workmen engaged in security services
Nil
Property Guards Vs.UTI
seeking regularisation in UTI. (26 workmen).
(arising out of W.P.No.3435 of 1990)
3.
CGIT, Mumbai No: 78 of 2004 -
Contract workmen engaged in security services
Nil
Property Guards Vs.UTI (arising out
seeking regularisation in UTI (21 workmen).
of W.P.No.1165 of 1991)
4.
CGIT, Mumbai, No: 79 of 2004 George
Contract workmen engaged in cleaning services
Nil
& Modern Maintenance Services Vs
seeking regularisation in UTI. (19 workmen)..
UTI (arising out of W.P.No.2129 of 1999)

---

317
Sr.No.
Name and No. of the case
Nature of dispute
Amt. involved
5.
CGIT, Mumbai No: 80 of 2004 -
Contract workmen engaged in security services
Nil
Property Guards Vs.UTI
seeking regularisation in UTI. (23 workmen).
(arising out of W.P.No.2017 of 1992)
6.
Delhi H.C. - Atul Kumar Jain Vs. UTI
Seeking not to be relieved under VSS as he has
Nil
(WP.No.8778 of 2004)
withdrawn his VSS application
7.
CGIT Mumbai - S.R.Keer Vs. UTI
Dismissed employee seeking reinstatement on
Rs.1.8 million
(CGIT No.I/ 25 of 2004)
the ground that he has been acquitted
(Assistant dismissed
subsequently by criminal court on same charges
w.e.f. 13.02.1986)
8.
CGIT Mumbai - BKKM Vs. UTI
Contract workmen engaged in cleaning services
Nil
(CGIT No.I/ 48 of 2004)
seeking regularisation in UTI. (11 workmen)
(arising out of WP 3934 of 2000)
9.
CGIT Mumbai - AIUTEA Vs. UTI
AIUTEA seeking restoration of facility of the
Nil
(CGIT No.I/ 20 of 2004)
encashment of leave
10.
CGIT Mumbai - AIUTEA Vs. UTI
AIUTEA seeking for 3
rd
pension option.
Rs. 175 million
(CGIT No.I/ 26 of 2004)
(The option is
effective from the
year 2000. The
liability is towards
additional funding
required in
respect of left
over Class III
and Class IV staff
as on date.)
However, if all the
1365 employees
who have not
opted for pension
as on September
2003 (pre VSS)
are given the
option, the financial
liability will be
Rs.868.7 million.
11.
Delhi H.C. - A.K.Anand Vs. UTI
Seeking promotion to Gr.’C’ retrospectively from
Rs.50,000/-
(WP.No.1067 of 1999)
01.01.95. However, he has been subsequently
(IR-3-35)
promoted to Gr.’C’ on 10.05.1999.
12.
Delhi H.C. - A.K.Anand Vs. UTI
Seeking stay of his deputation to UTIISL,
Nil
(WP.No.6567 of 2002)
Navi Mumbai
(The earlier W.P.No.1369 of 2002
has been disposed off)
13.
Guwahati Civil Court - Mukesh
Seeking to consider his Promotion to Gr.’B’
Nil
Kapoor Vs. UTI
(Title Suit No.31 of 2004)
14.
Allahabad H.C. - Shyamji Mishra &
Ex-temporary employee seeking regularisation as
Nil
ors. Vs. UTI
permanent employee
(WP No.32954 of 1990)

---

318