x-ineffi ciency , which means that their
cost levels are higher than they would be in competitive
fi rms because they do not have the incentive for process
innovation. Th
ey become less dynamic, doing things in
a particular way simply through tradition. In addition,
some of their investment may take the form of erecting
barriers to maintain the level of abnormal profi t by
excluding potential rivals. Th
is will add to costs in the short
run. It may be true but there is the possibility that these
ineffi
ciencies are outweighed by economies of scale that
lower average costs.
It is clear that monopolies can operate in ways that lead
to ineffi
ciency or consumer exploitation. However, one can
make a positive case for monopoly. Th
is explains why the
investigation of monopoly practices is diffi
cult and each
case must be judged on its own merits. It is dangerous to
assume that monopoly is always harmful; the performance
of a monopolist may be little diff erent from that of fi rms
in oligopoly.
Contestable markets So far, in dealing with market structures, the four models
shown in
Figure 7.13
have been analysed. A
contestable market is not listed here. Th
is is because although
contestability increasingly features in many markets
throughout the world, it is not really a market structure as
such. It is best seen as a set of conditions that can apply in
any market structure.
Contestable market: any market structure where there
is a threat that potential entrants are free and able to enter
this market.
KEY TERM
By defi nition, a
perfectly contestable market is one in
which there are no costs of entry and exit. So, only perfect
competition matches this ideal; monopolistic competition,
with few relatively costless barriers to entry and exit,
can match it to some extent, as can oligopoly in certain
situations.
A contestable market can be particularly seen as a
means by which governments have sought to deregulate
markets. Th
is requires the removal of barriers to entry so
opening up the market to competition. It has had particular
signifi cance in the UK; the principle of contestability
has been central to the tremendous structural changes
that have been made especially to the service sector of
the economy with the introduction of new forms of
competition into formerly protected markets.