Practice tasks 2: Sample answers
PART 3
•
Do you think that learning about the arts (for example, painting and music)
at school is as important as learning other subjects like maths and science?
If a school’s responsibility is to prepare its students for the real world
then, yes, I do think they should teach about the arts. Things like maths
and science are important because they’re practical, they’re skills that
we might need when we start work. However, learning about the arts
means that we can function more effectively with more people in more
social situations. If all you can talk about is football or last night’s
television, then that’s going to limit your ability to interact socially. If
you can talk about the arts, recognise paintings or sculptures or classical
music and so on, then that will widen your social skills. I think that
means that you’re more likely to succeed in life.
•
How important do you think it is for museums and art galleries to be free to
enter?
I think that if museums and galleries want to encourage people to learn
about and enjoy art and culture, then they should be free to enter. Most
people I know would pay to see a film, a concert or a sporting event, but
they probably wouldn’t pay to go into a museum or an art gallery, so they
wouldn’t do it. However, there’s a problem. If museums don’t charge an
entrance fee, how can they operate? I imagine they cost a lot to run, and
of course the paintings and objects cost a lot to buy. Some museums
compromise. They make entry free, but they ask visitors for a voluntary
financial contribution. I’m not sure how successful this is, because I
guess that not everybody would donate.
•
Do you
think that seeing a painting, sculpture
or other work of art in a
museum or a gallery is more rewarding than seeing
it in a book or on the
internet?
I’m not so sure about books, but the internet is a great way of looking at,
for example, a famous painting. You can zoom in on the painting to look
at details, which you can’t do in a gallery, and the pictures are often
accompanied by a detailed explanation of what you’re looking at, or
provide links so that you can see other works by the same artist. On the
other hand, there’s a certain feeling you get when you see a famous
painting for real in a museum. I can’t explain it, but it’s really quite
exciting. You’re looking at the actual work of art, not its virtual version,
and there’s a connection, a feeling that you’ve somehow got closer to the
artist. It’s much more rewarding.
WRITING
The subject of whether governments should subsidise the arts at the expense of
services like education, healthcare and public transport is controversial. Some
say they should and some say they shouldn’t, and both groups have valid
arguments.
Those who oppose the subsidising of the arts in favour of essential services
focus on the key word, ‘essential’. Healthcare saves lives, education teaches
us important skills which we will need throughout our lives and public
transport helps us get around while reducing our reliance on cars, thus helping
the environment. In my country, the government is often criticised for not
putting enough money into these essential services. For example, our national
health system is stretched to its limit. There aren’t enough doctors, other
healthcare workers are underpaid and the hospitals themselves are under-
equipped. Surely, people argue, saving a human life is more important than
paying an opera company to do a world tour.
Those who support subsidising the arts also have a compelling argument. Our
film-making industry, our theatres, our museums and galleries and so on are
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: