part
of
the
timber
floor
was
being
restored
to
the
existing
state
4
Roof
40,156.00
401.56
14
143,530.00
703.58
32
Case
study
1
Works
involved
includes
the
installation
of
temporary
roof
and
restoration
of
roof
frame
Case
study
2
Works
involved
includes
the
restoration
of
roof
timber
frame.
Treatment
was
done
to
the
existing
timber
frame
(
continued
)
Table I.
Restoration cost for
case study 1 and 2
314
SS
33,4/5
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
Case
study
1
Case
study
2
GFA
(M2)
100
GFA
(M2)
204
Item
Description
Total
cost
(RM)
Cost/M2
(RM)
%
Total
cost
(RM)
Cost/M2
(RM)
%
Remarks
5
Staircase
16,216.00
162.16
6
––
0
Case
study
1
Works
involved
includes
the
demolition
of
existing
staircase
and
construction
of
new
staircase
6
Wall
44,500.00
445.00
16
32,717.50
160.38
7
Case
study
1
New
wall
installed
and
to
match
the
existing
material
and
design
of
the
existing
wall
Case
study
2
33%
of
timber
wall
was
being
replaced
with
a
new
wall.
The
existing
timber
wall
were
treated
7
Door
9,600.00
96.00
3
19,550.00
95.83
4
Case
study
1
Basically
there
are
only
3
nos
of
timber
door
and
the
works
involved
includes
testing,
removal
of
existing
door
leaf
and,
supply
and
install
a
new
door
Case
study
2
8
nos
of
timber
door
and
the
works
involved
includes
testing,
removal
of
existing
door
leaf
and,
supply
and
install
a
new
door
8
Window
54,850.00
548.50
19
5,175.00
25.37
1
Case
study
1
There
are
only
20
nos
of
timber
window
and
the
works
involved
includes
testing,
removal
of
existing
window
and,
supply
and
install
a
new
window
Case
study
2
Only
6
nos
of
timber
window
being
replaced
and
the
works
involved
includes
testing,
removal
of
existing
window
and,
supply
and
install
a
new
window
9
Wall
finishes
19,140.00
191.40
7
9,338.00
45.77
2
Case
study
1
The
works
involved
were
testing,
scraping
the
existing
painting
and
painting
works
(includes
undercoat
and
gloss
paint)
Case
study
2
The
works
involved
were
testing,
scraping
the
existing
painting
and
painting
works
(includes
undercoat
and
gloss
paint)
(
continued
)
Table I.
315
Restoration
of historical
timber
building
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
Case
study
1
Case
study
2
GFA
(M2)
100
GFA
(M2)
204
Item
Description
Total
cost
(RM)
Cost/M2
(RM)
%
Total
cost
(RM)
Cost/M2
(RM)
%
Remarks
10
Floor
finishes
14,371.00
143.71
5
––
–
Case
study
1
The
works
involved
were
testing,
scraping
the
existing
painting
and
painting
works
(includes
undercoat
and
gloss
paint)
11
Ceiling
finishes
7,800.00
78.00
3
5,060.00
24.80
1
Case
study
1
New
veiling
timber
board
was
installed
Case
study
2
The
existing
ceiling
is
still
in
good
condition.
Only
painting
works
involved
for
this
element
Total
building
cost
285,485.00
2,854.85
100
447,870.50
2,195.44
100
Table I.
316
SS
33,4/5
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
4.1.3 Analysis on both case studies
. Case study 1 shows that the most influential
elements are upper floors, windows, walls and roof whereas, case study 2 shows that the
most influential elements are the frame, roof, upper floors and walls The upper floors,
roof and walls appeared to be the most influencing elements in both case studies. These
three elements play a big role in influencing the restoration cost for both historical timber
building. The Scope of restoration works play a big role in the overall cost of the
restoration of these two buildings as the quantity and quality of works need to be
preserved and conserved depending on the structural safety assessment and the
materials itself that may includes the original materials, structural systems and
techniques. The availability of skilled workers also influenced the restoration cost as
proven in the case study 1, where there was a difficulty in finding a skilled worker who
specialised in constructing the wall. Akintoye (2000) stated that the main factors
influencing cost estimates include the complexity of the project, scale and scope of
construction, current market condition, method of constructions, site constraints, client
’
s
financial position, the buildability of the project as well as the location of the project.
4.2 Questionnaire survey analysis
There were 30 questions posted in the questionnaire, which were handed directly to the
respondents. The respondents were selected from quantity surveyors, consulting firms
and the contractors who are involved in conservation projects. In all, 64 per cent of the
respondents were quantity surveyors while 36 per cent are contractors.
Figure 3 shows that 65 per cent of the respondents do involved in timber restoration
projects while 35 per cent of the respondents do not involved in any timber
Roof
32%
Wall
7%
Upper Floor
17%
Frame
36%
Door
4%
Wall Finishes
2%
Window
1%
Ceiling
1%
Figure 2.
Cost of restoration
for timber house
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Yes
No
Contractor
3
3
3
3
Quantity Surveyor
4
10
4
10
Figure 3.
Respondent
involvement in
restoration of
historic timber
building
317
Restoration
of historical
timber
building
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
restoration project. This is due to a limited number of historic timber building
restoration projects available in Malaysia. The cause of problems in historic timber
buildings restoration and the respondents
’
feedbacks were tabulated in Table II.
From the mean value obtained, it shows that
“
Termites
”
got the highest score with
μ
¼
4.45 while
“
Mechanical failure
”
scored the lowest score of
μ
¼
3.10. It also shows
that the timber has a higher probability of being attacked by termites, followed by
fungi, improper preservative method, weathering as well as other factors such as the
attack from other insects as well human caused or mechanical failures.
Figure 4 shows that 80 per cent of respondents choose the original material for
timber replacement while only 20 per cent of respondents prefer new materials to
replace the damaged part of timber. Respondents who prefer original material believed
that the restoration should try to maintain the original design, material and techniques
as much as possible. Different types of timber have different strength and composition.
Therefore, it is important to use or replace the damaged timber with the original
material. In total, 20 per cent of the respondents who chose to replace damaged timber
with new materials has in the opinion that it should be replaced using a new material in
order to suit with the era and using more material can be more economical and such
material are more durable. Totally, 10 per cent of the respondents are believed that the
timber was readily available whilst 35 per cent of the respondents viewed that it was
difficult to obtain while the rest remained neutral (Figure 5).
From the mean value in Table III, the lack of analysis on the damaged building got
the highest score with
μ
¼
4.05. This shows that the restoration was done with less
testing and analysis on the extents of the damages level. This creates problems in the
repairing and restoration process. Hence, it is important that the historic timber
building should undergo full testing and analysis to obtain all the needed data before
Factors
Mean
SD
Rank
Termites
4.45
0.510
1
Fungi
4.15
0.587
2
Impropriate preservative method
3.95
0.826
3
Weathering
3.85
1.040
4
Other insects
3.80
0.616
5
Human caused
3.65
1.040
6
Mechanical failure
3.10
1.165
7
Table II.
Ranking of the cause
of problems to
historic timber
building based on
respondent vote
Other new material
Original type of material
4, 20%
16, 80%
Figure 4.
Choice of material
to replaced
damaged timber
318
SS
33,4/5
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
the implementation of any restoration work. It is vital to investigate the cause of
damage and use the most appropriate preservative methods to prevent further
damages to the buildings. The lack of awareness and interest among contractors
showed the lowest score of
μ
¼
3.65. This shows that the contractors are generally not
interested in the project and do not have proper knowledge on the restoration of
historic timber buildings. Insufficient data of the restoration project and impropriate
preservative method also obtained the similar mean.
From the mean value in Table IV, the availability of material got the highest score
with
μ
¼
4.35 while the degree of damage got the lowest score of
μ
¼
4.10. This shows
that the factors affecting the restoration cost depends highly on availability of material,
followed by the complexity of project, availability of workmanship, method of
restoration, condition of site and degree of damages.
5. Conclusion
Restoration of damaged structures is important in order to conserve timber historical
buildings. This paper identified the most crucial building elements influencing cost for
35%
10%
55%
Neutral
Readily available
Difficult to obtain
Figure 5.
Availability
of timber
Factors
Mean
SD
Rank
Lack of analysis of the damaged building
4.05
0.999
1
Impropriate preservative method
4.00
0.858
2
Insufficient data of the restoration project
4.00
1.026
3
Complicity of the restoration part
3.85
0.875
4
Poor workmanship
3.75
1.070
5
Lack of awareness and interest by the contractor
3.65
1.040
6
Table III.
Timber restoration
process problems
Factors
Mean
SD
Rank
Availability of material
4.35
0.489
1
Complexity of project
4.30
0.733
2
Availability of workmanship
4.20
0.696
3
Method of restoration
4.20
0.696
3
Condition of site
4.15
0.745
5
Degree of damage
4.10
0.912
6
Table IV.
Factors affecting
cost of timber
restoration
319
Restoration
of historical
timber
building
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
timber restorations works in Malaysia. Building cost accounted for greater percentage
of the contract sum in timber building restorations works. In terms of elemental cost,
the upper floors, roof and walls appeared to be the most influencing elements in
the examined case studies. These three elements play a big role in influencing the
restoration cost for both historical timber building. The understanding of the
restoration process is vital to ensure the authenticity and significance of a historical
building is being kept. The importance of preservation is highlighted in the fact that,
there appeared to be a large percentage who agreed to replacing damaged timber with
the original material (same type of timber), despite difficulty in obtaining the material.
The most destructive agent of timber degradation identified were termites, others
included fungi, improper preservative method, weathering and other insects.
It was also revealed in the study that restoration costs were highly affected by the
availability of material, availability of skilled workers, while the degree of damage of
the timber building elements was not a big factor affecting restoration costs.
Lack of analysis on the damaged building, lack of awareness and interest among
contractors, insufficient data of the restoration project and impropriate preservative
method were identified as the factors posing difficulties and challenges to timber
restoration projects. Although the availability of material can be the main factor
affecting the cost of timber restoration, most respondents still belief that the restoration
process is crucial to replace the damaged timber with the same type of timber. While
the predominant problem with historic timber buildings was identified to be termites,
lack of analysis of the damages in the building was the main catalyst for the restoration
of the buildings. The restoration process is one which has to be clearly understood.
The nature and extent of each scope of works is crucial to assist in estimating cost for
timber restoration. Factors influencing the timber restoration cost should be available
to the estimator so they can produce better estimates. The elements that need more
allocation of budget are wall, roof and the upper floors. Thus, maintaining or replacing
these elements with other materials, can help to minimise the restoration costs of timber
buildings. This study can act as a reference for preparation of preliminary estimation of
new restoration projects on historic timber buildings.
References
Ahmad, A.G. (2004),
“
Understanding common building defects: the dilapidation survey report
”
(Online), available at: www.hbp.usm.my/conservation/ (accessed 9 September 2014).
Ahmad, A.G. and Abdul-Rahman, H.F. (2005),
“
Restoration and refurbishment of old city hall,
Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia
”
,
International Conference on Construction and Real Estate
Management, Wang Yaowueds
, Vol. 2, China Architecture and Building Press, pp. 1356-1361.
Akintoye, A. (2000),
“
Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice
”
,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 77-89.
Awang, N.A.G., Hanum, F. and Tuan-Marina, T.I. (2008),
“
Relationship between economic
value and species diversity of timber resources in a hill forest
”
,
Journal of Sustainable
Development
, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 17-26.
Feilden, B.M. (2003),
Conservation of Historic Buildings
, 3rd ed., Architecture Press.
Harun, S.N. (2011),
“
Historical building conservation in Malaysia: experience and challenges,
University Teknologi
”
, MARA Perak, 21 April.
International Specialised Skills Institute (2011),
Preservation and Restoration of Timber Heritage
Structures
, International Specialized Skills Institute, Melbourne.
320
SS
33,4/5
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
Killman, W., Tom, S. and Hong, L.T. (1994),
Restoring and Reconstructing the Malay Timber
House
, Published by Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Kleboe, J. (2004),
Timber and the Built Environment Conference
, Historic Scotland, Edinburgh.
Mustafa, N.K.F., Johar, S., Ahmad, A.G., Zulkarnain, S.H., Rahman, M.Y.A. and
Che-Ani, A.I. (2011),
“
Conservation and repair works for traditional timber mosque in
malaysia: a review on techniques
”
,
World Academy of Science, Engineering and
Technology
, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 663-668.
Oram, P. (1994),
The Repair and Maintenance of Historic Buildings: A Brief Guide for Owners,
Architects and Agents
, The Northern Ireland Historic Building Council, Belfast.
Reyers, J. and Mansfield, J. (2001),
“
The assessment of risk in conservation refurbishment
projects
”
,
Structural Survey
, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 238-244. doi: 10.1108/02630800110412480.
Wong, T.M. (2009),
Architectural Use of Timber in Malaysia
, Malaysian Timber Council,
Kuala Lumpur.
Woon, W.L. and Mui, L.Y. (2010),
“
Elemental cost for building conservation worked in Malaysia
”
,
Structural Survey
, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 408-419.
Yin, K.R. (2003),
Applications of Case Study Research
, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks,
CA.
Yin, K.R. (2009),
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
, 4th ed., Sage Publications, Thousand
Oaks, CA.
Yip, K.Y. (2011),
“
Area-based conservation and urban regeneration: a case study of Nga Tsin Wai
village redevelopment project
”
, master thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam,
Hong Kong.
Corresponding author
Professor Azlan Shah Ali can be contacted at: asafab@um.edu.my
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details:
permissions@emeraldinsight.com
321
Restoration
of historical
timber
building
Downloaded by University of Malaya At 19:20 06 June 2016 (PT)
View publication stats
View publication stats
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |