The Language of Law School This page intentionally left blank

Investigating
Obsolescence
, ed. Nancy Dorian, 103–116. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press, 1989.
———. “Teaching Lawyers the Language of Law: Legal and Anthropological Translations.”
John Marshall Law Review
 34 (2000): 91–117.
———. “The Uses of History: Language, Ideology, and Law in the United States and South
Africa.”
 Law & Society Review
 22 (1988): 661–685.
Mertz, Elizabeth, Wamucii Njogu, and Susan Gooding. “What Difference Does Differ-
ence Make? The Challenge for Legal Education.” 
Journal of Legal Education
 48
(1998): 1–87.
Mertz, Elizabeth, and Richard Parmentier, eds. 
Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psy-
chological Perspectives.
 New York: Academic Press, 1985.
Mertz, Elizabeth, and Bernard Weissbourd. “Legal Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Vari-
ability and Its Limits.” In 
Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspec-
tives
, ed. Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier, 261–285. New York: Academic
Press, 1985.
Michaels, Sarah. “Narrative Presentations: An Oral Preparation for Literacy with First
Graders.” In 
The Social Construction of Literacy
, ed. Jenny Cook-Gumperz, 94–116.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

---

Bibliography
293
———. “Sharing Time: Children’s Narrative Styles and Differential Access to Literacy.”
Language in Society 
10 (1981): 423–442.
Michaels, Sarah, and James Collins. “Oral Discourse Styles: Classroom Interaction and the
Acquisition of Literacy.” In 
Coherence in Written and Spoken Discourse
, ed. Deborah
Tannen, 219–244. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.
Mickelson, Roslyn. “The Case of the Missing Brackets: Teachers and Social Reproduction.”
Journal of Education
 169 (1987): 78–88.
Minow, Martha. 
Making All the Difference.
 Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Mitchell, Jacquelyn. “Black Children after the Eighties: Surviving the New Technology?”
Harvard Educational Review
 55 (1985): 354.
Mitchell, John. “Current Theories on Expert and Novice Thinking: A Full Faculty Con-
siders the Implications for Legal Education.” 
Journal of Legal Education
 39 (1989):
275–297.
Moore, Sally Falk, ed. 
Law and Anthropology: A Reader
. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
———. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Field as an Appropriate Subject
of Study.” 
Law & Society Review
 7 (1973): 719–746.
———.
Social Facts and Fabrications: Customary Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980.
 Cam-
bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Moore, Underhill, and Charles Callahan. “Law and Learning Theory: A Study in Legal
Control.”
 Yale Law Journal
 53 (1943): 1–136.
Morgan, Edmund. “The Case Method.” 
Journal of Legal Education
 4 (1952): 379–391.
Morine-Dershimer, Greta. “Instructional Strategy and the ‘Creation’ of Classroom Sta-
tus.”
American Educational Research Journal
 20 (1983): 645–661.
Morris, Robert. “Not Thinking Like a Non-Lawyer: Implications of ‘Recognization’ for
Legal Education and Intellectual Due Process.” Paper presented at Knowledge & Dis-
course: Speculating on Disciplinary Futures, 2nd International Conference, Hong
Kong, June 2002. 
Web Proceedings
, ed. C. Barron, P. Benson, and N. Bruce, July 2003,
available at http://ec.hku.hk/kd2proc/default.asp.
Multicultural Women Attorneys Network. 
The Burdens of Both, the Privileges of Neither.
Chicago: American Bar Association, 1994.
Nader, Laura, ed.