Culture of Peace (Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age, 2006), 247–58.
Interreligious Dialogue and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: An Empirical View · 303
2. See, for instance, Marc Ross, “The Relevance of Culture for the Study of
Political Psychology and Ethnic Conflict,” Political Psychology 18, no. 2 (1997):
299–326; Jonathan Fox, “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Ethno-Religious Con-
flict,” Nations and Nationalism 5, no. 4 (1999): 431–63; Mark Jeurgensmeyer, The
New Cold War? (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993); John Paul Led-
erach, Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington,
D.C.: United States Institute of Peace, 1997); Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash
of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon and Schuster,
1996).
3. Robert J. Fisher, The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict
Resolution (New York: Springer, 1990), 149.
4. Clifford Geertz, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in M. Banton, ed., An-
thropological Approaches to the Study of Religion (London: Tavistock, 1966), 1–46;
Samuel P. Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs 72, no. 3
(Summer 1993): 22–49.
5. See, for instance, Douglas Johnston and Cynthia Sampson, eds., Religion,
the Missing Dimension of Statecraft (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
6. This key issue has been treated in important works such as R. Scott Ap-
pleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield,
2000); and Mark Gopin, Between Eden and Armageddon: The Future of World Reli-
gions, Violence, and Peacemaking (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
7. See Mollov and Lavie, “Culture, Dialogue, and Perception Change”;
Mollov and Lavie, “Arab-Jewish Women’s Inter-religious Dialogue Evaluated”;
and Mollov et al., “The Impact of Israeli-Palestinian Intercultural Dialogue.”
8. Ben Mollov and Musa Barhoum, “Building Cultural/Religious Bridges
between Arab and Jewish University Students,” 1998, Internet sites Ariga and
Meria.
9. Ben Mollov, “The Role of Religion in Conflict Resolution: An Israeli-Pales-
tinian Student Dialogue,” Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, 1999.
10. Ben Mollov and Chaim Lavie, “Culture, Dialogue, and Perception
Change.”
11. In this particular case, perceptions of the Israeli Jewish participants, both
religious and secular, have always been favorable.
12. Mollov and Barhoum, “Building Cultural/Religious Bridges”; Mollov,
“The Role of Religion.”
13. See S. L. Jarvenpaa and D. E. Leidner, “Communication and Trust in
Global Virtual Teams,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communications 3, no. 4
(1998).
14. Mollov et al., “The Impact of Israeli-Palestinian Intercultural Dialogue.”
15. See D. Byrne, “Attitude and Attraction,” in Leonard Berkowitz, ed.,
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (New York: Academic Press, 1969),
4:36–89; T. M. Newcomb, The Acquaintance Process (New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, 1961); M. Rokeach, ed., The Open and Closed Mind (New York: Ba-
sic Books, 1960); M. Hewstone, “The Ultimate Attribution Error? A Review of
304 · Ben Mollov
Literature on Intergroup Casual Attribution,” European Journal of Social Psychol-
ogy 20 (1990): 311–35.
16. Louis Kriesberg, “The Role of Reconciliation in Changing Inter-Commu-
nal Accommodations,” paper presented at the International Peace Research As-
sociation meetings, Tampere, Finland, August 2000, 6.
17. Colin Knox, and Joanne Hughes, “Crossing the Divide: Community Rela-
tions in Northern Ireland,” Journal of Peace Research 33 (1996): 83–98.
18. Raymond Cohen, Theatre of Power: The Art of Diplomatic Signaling (Lon-
don: Longman, 1987), 56.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |