The key point to remember about a sterilized intervention is that the central bank
etary base and the money supply. In the context of the model of exchange rate deter-
bonds in the hands of the public unchanged. The curve depicting the supply of dollar assets would thus
shift to the left slightly, which also works toward raising the exchange rate, yielding the same conclu-
cule fraction of the total amount of dollar assets outstanding, the supply curve would shift by an
imperceptible amount. This is why Figure 16.1 is drawn with the supply curve unchanged.
378
Part 5 Financial Markets
intervention has almost no effect on the exchange rate. A sterilized intervention
leaves the money supply unchanged and so has no direct way of affecting interest
rates.
2
Because the relative expected return on dollar assets is unaffected, the
demand curve would remain at
D
1
in Figure 16.1, and the exchange rate would remain
unchanged at
E
1
.
At first it might seem puzzling that a central bank purchase or sale of domestic
currency that is sterilized does not lead to a change in the exchange rate. A central bank
purchase of domestic currency cannot raise the exchange rate, because with no effect
on the domestic money supply or interest rates, any resulting rise in the exchange rate
would mean that there would be an excess supply of dollar assets. With more people
willing to sell dollar assets than to buy them, the exchange rate would have to fall back
to its initial equilibrium level, where the demand and supply curves intersect.
2
A sterilized intervention changes the amount of foreign securities relative to domestic securities in
the hands of the public, called a
portfolio balance effect. Through this effect,
the central bank might
be able to affect the interest differential between domestic and foreign assets, which in turn affects the
relative expected return of domestic assets. Empirical evidence has not revealed this portfolio balance
effect to be significant. However, a sterilized intervention could indicate what central banks want to
happen to the future exchange rate and so might provide a signal about the course of future monetary
policy. In this way a sterilized intervention could lead to shifts in the demand curve for domestic assets
and ultimately affect the exchange rate. However, the future change in monetary policy—not the steril-
ized intervention—is the source of the exchange rate effect. For a further discussion of the signaling
and portfolio balance effects and the possible differential effects of sterilized versus unsterilized inter-
vention, see Paul Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld, International Economics, 8th ed. (Boston: Addison-
Wesley, 2009).
S
Exchange Rate, E
t
(euro/$)
Quantity of Dollar Assets
E
2
E
1
D
2
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: