two-year interest rate is 5.75%. Plugging these numbers into our equation yields
which is the same as the expected interest rate used in Example 3, as it should be.
Our analysis of the term structure thus provides managers of financial institu-
tions with a fairly straightforward procedure for producing interest-rate forecasts.
Then they need merely apply the formula in Equation 6 to derive the market’s fore-
casts of future interest rates.
As we will see in Chapter 6, the bond market’s forecasts of interest rates may
be the most accurate ones possible. If this is the case, the estimates of the market’s
forecasts of future interest rates using the simple procedure outlined here may be
the best interest-rate forecasts that a financial institution manager can obtain.
112
Part 2 Fundamentals of Financial Markets
A customer asks a bank if it would be willing to commit to making the customer a one-
year loan at an interest rate of 8% one year from now. To compensate for the costs of mak-
ing the loan, the bank needs to charge one percentage point more than the expected
interest rate on a Treasury bond with the same maturity if it is to make a profit. If the
bank manager estimates the liquidity premium to be 0.4%, and the one-year Treasury bond
rate is 6% and the two-year bond rate is 7%, should the manager be willing to make
the commitment?
Solution
The bank manager is unwilling to make the loan because at an interest rate of 8%, the loan
is likely to be unprofitable to the bank.
where
i
n + 1t
=
two-year bond rate
= 0.07
l
n + 1
t
=
liquidity premium
= 0.004
i
nt
=
one-year bond rate
= 0.06
l
1t
=
liquidity premium
= 0
n
=
number of years
= 1
Thus,
The market’s forecast of the one-year Treasury bond rate one year in the future is there-
fore 7.2%. Adding the 1% necessary to make a profit on the one-year loan means that
the loan is expected to be profitable only if it has an interest rate of 8.2% or higher.
i
e
t
⫹1
⫽
11 ⫹ 0.07 ⫺ 0.0042
2
1
⫹ 0.06
⫺ 1 ⫽ 0.072 ⫽ 7.2%
i
e
t
⫹n
⫽
11 ⫹ i
n
⫹1t
⫺ l
n
⫹1t
2
n
⫹1
11 ⫹ i
nt
⫺ l
nt
2
n
⫺ 1
E X A M P L E 5 . 5
Forward Rate
S U M M A R Y
1. Bonds with the same maturity will have different
interest rates because of three factors: default risk,
liquidity, and tax considerations. The greater a bond’s
default risk, the higher its interest rate relative to
other bonds; the greater a bond’s liquidity, the lower
its interest rate; and bonds with tax-exempt status
will have lower interest rates than they otherwise
would. The relationship among interest rates on
bonds with the same maturity that arise because of
these three factors is known as the risk structure of
interest rates.
2. Several theories of the term structure provide expla-
nations of how interest rates on bonds with different
terms to maturity are related. The expectations the-
ory views long-term interest rates as equaling the
average of future short-term interest rates expected
7. If a yield curve looks like the one below, what is the
market predicting about the movement of future
short-term interest rates? What might the yield curve
indicate about the market’s predictions about the
inflation rate in the future?
Chapter 5 How Do Risk and Term Structure Affect Interest Rates?
113
to occur over the life of the bond. By contrast, the
market segmentation theory treats the determination
of interest rates for each bond’s maturity as the out-
come of supply and demand in that market only.
Neither of these theories by itself can explain the fact
that interest rates on bonds of different maturities
move together over time and that yield curves usually
slope upward.
3. The liquidity premium theory combines the features
of the other two theories, and by so doing is able to
explain the facts just mentioned. It views long-term
interest rates as equaling the average of future
short-term interest rates expected to occur over the
life of the bond plus a liquidity premium. This the-
ory allows us to infer the market’s expectations
about the movement of future short-term interest
rates from the yield curve. A steeply upward-sloping
curve indicates that future short-term rates are
expected to rise, a mildly upward-sloping curve indi-
cates that short-term rates are expected to stay the
same, a flat curve indicates that short-term rates are
expected to decline slightly, and an inverted yield
curve indicates that a substantial decline in short-
term rates is expected in the future.
Yield to
Maturity
Term to Maturity
K E Y T E R M S
credit-rating agencies, p. 92
default, p. 90
default-free bonds, p. 90
expectations theory, p. 98
forward rate, p. 110
inverted yield curve, p. 96
junk bonds, p. 92
liquidity premium theory, p. 103
market segmentation theory, p. 102
risk premium, p. 90
risk structure of interest rates, p. 89
spot rate, p. 110
term structure of interest rates,
p. 89
yield curve, p. 96
Q U E S T I O N S
1. Which should have the higher risk premium on its
interest rates, a corporate bond with a Moody’s Baa
rating or a corporate bond with a C rating? Why?
2. Why do U.S. Treasury bills have lower interest rates
than large-denomination negotiable bank CDs?
3. Risk premiums on corporate bonds are usually anti-
cyclical; that is, they decrease during business cycle
expansions and increase during recessions. Why is
this so?
4. “If bonds of different maturities are close substitutes,
their interest rates are more likely to move together.”
Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain
your answer.
5. If yield curves, on average, were flat, what would this
say about the liquidity premiums in the term struc-
ture? Would you be more or less willing to accept the
pure expectations theory?
6. If a yield curve looks like the one shown here, what
is the market predicting about the movement of
future short-term interest rates? What might the yield
curve indicate about the market’s predictions about
the inflation rate in the future?
Yield to
Maturity
Term to Maturity