PART I Enhancing the Quality of Education and Training for the Public Sector
focused on the ability to quickly and effectively assess whether the programs that
public agencies, or their contractors, are delivering are, in fact, meeting the needs
of their clientele in the most effective possible manner. Increasingly, governments
are developing systems of performance measurement in which significant indica-
tors of program performance or consequence are used to assess success, both in
terms of the effectiveness of the services delivered and, in comparison, to other
agencies and governments.
Performance assessment has been widely used in education programs generally,
as a means of facilitating evaluation and accountability. Recently, it has begun to
find its way into public administration education in the United States as discus-
sions have begun about the possibility of the development of a national test in
the field of public administration education. Similar discussions have taken place
in other countries. Also, as accreditation systems have emerged in different parts
of the world, there has been a growing interest in the development of compara-
tive assessment data.
This general development has given rise to a number of new techniques, which
are increasingly being used in order to facilitate programmatic assessment. These
include the development of institutional effectiveness matrices, programmatic
rubrics and, most recently, academic learning compacts. In each instance, these
approaches are based on the development of specific student learning objectives
and involve the assessment of whether, in fact, the students’ performance reflects
their achievement. The implementation of such systems requires the careful speci-
fication of both desired student outcomes and the criteria for assessing whether
those outcomes have been achieved. This, of course, requires the development
of course and/or program objectives that are measurable and/or observable, and
clearly specified for both faculty and students. It is then necessary to collect data
on whether these objectives have been achieved, and of course, optimally feed that
data back into course and program development.
In addition to these formal efforts at program assessment, various other in-
novations are under way in different academic programs to attempt to encourage
increased academic excellence. These include the introduction of “capstone courses”
that are designed to provide an overview of a student’s total academic program. The
requirements in such courses are often structured in such a fashion as to emulate
the kind of activities in which a professional public administrator would engage.
Thus, rather than doing a regular course paper, a student might prepare a report
addressing an actual public policy problem.
While many of these innovations are institutionally based, there have also been
some efforts to initiate externally based program assessment activities designed at
enhancing excellence. Efforts have been made, especially in Europe, to apply these
ISO 2000 process to public administration education and training. In the United
States, proposals have been made to establishing nationwide prizes to reward out-
standing programs. Finally, in the United States, and increasingly in Europe and
17
Excellence in Public Administration Education: Preparing the Next Generation …
in other parts of the world as well, growing attention is being given to specialized
accreditation in the field of public administration.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |